Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I have been notified that dungeon master Lance Uppercut has shared all 10 of my videos from the Visible Proof series. And it was all for the sake of providing a link, which he must feel makes an effective counter-attack. I will show you that it doesn't, but first notice the address of the link:

http://oswaldinthedoorwaynotreally.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/billy-nolan-loveladys-1273-id-points-of.html

Notice that it's oswald in the doorway not really. blogspot. co. uk. That's UK. UK. UK. UK. That's where he is, for sure. 

Obviously, Lance Uppercut is not his real name, so who is he? He's probably just bpete (95%  chance), and if not, then he is someone tightly involved in the dis-info web that bpete is in. You recall I discovered there is a vast JFK dis-info web operating out of the UK. 

So, what does he say in this scathing new article?

He starts by saying it all comes down to the shirt patterns and that it can easily be seen that Doorman's shirt pattern is Lovelady's plaid.

First, at first glance, if you had to say which pattern was the odd one, which would you say? No two are a perfect match, granted, but which one stands out as being jarringly different from the other two? 

Notice that Oswald's shirt does have shiny light areas due to the material being threadbare. Notice that Lovelady has not only got distinct horizontal lines, but THEY ARE DOUBLE LINES, alternating white over black and black over white. Fix on that for a few seconds, and then look for those double lines on Doorman. 

Next, Lance Uppercut aka bpete aka Duncan MacRae wants to dismiss the sleeve because he's not sure it's Doorman's. He says he'll get to it later, but he said that months ago, and he never got to it. This is just bpete straddling the fence, taking advantage of a Joseph Backesism but not really wanting to embrace it. Like he did the other day when he said that Backes makes a darn strong argument about the bus and cab rides being faked, but later had to admit that he doesn't actually believe that himself. He's just a fucking liar. 

Next, to make his case, MacRae draws in the horizontal lines he wishes were there:

To refute that, all I have to do is show it to you without his art work:

 And here it is side by side with Lovelady:

You just can't get there that that matches, no matter how much you lie and dissemble. And look how consistent and low-contrast the upper left quadrant (our upper left) of Doorman's shirt is. But, Lovelady has flashy geometric pattern all the way up to and including his collar. Look how dark and consistent Doorman's collar is in comparison to Lovelady's flashy, high-contrast checkering.  

 That isn't just different- it's polar-opposite. Doorman's collar has no pattern; Lovelady's does. Doorman's collar has no pattern; Lovelady's does. Doorman's collar has no pattern; Lovelady's does. 

MacRae finishes with this gem:

Do not mistake that as an endorsement of Oswald's innocence. That is just MacRae kissing the behinds of CTs. MacRae is already on record that Oswald went up to the 6th floor to "lock and load." That I pummeled out of him. So, this is just pure sophistry, and it is a disgusting display. The lies don't stop- not even for Christmas. 

 Do you really think that on the date of November 22, 1963 that Billy Nolan Lovelady and Lee Harvey Oswald both showed up at work dressed like that, exactly the same? Not just wearing the same clothes but wearing them in the exact same and unusual manner? 

It is staggering to think that they try to deny this match. But, dastardly killers will deny many things, and their denials have no bounds.