Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

God, this guy is dense. Moron! I have to add 2 + 2 for him.

I don't have any explanatory problems with this. The pieces all fit for me. You are the one who is floundering in misunderstanding and confusion. 

You can't figure out why Marrion Baker or anyone else would have trouble recognizing Oswald's shirt in CE 150? It's because you're stupid.  They deliberately removed the jacket-like quality of it. CE 150 is phony, you dumb pluck!

Do you see the jacket-like quality on the left with the neat, jacket-like lapel that is folded over? Normal shirts don't behave like that. This was a very unusual garment, a hybrid between a shirt and a jacket. Odds are great that it was something he brought back with him from Russia. You see nothing like it on the right, right? That's a problem, dipshit. 

If the Warren Commission was going to exhibit Oswald's shirt, why not exhibit it with him in it? Wouldn't that prove that it was authentic? But once you divorce him from the shirt, anything goes. They could show anything they wanted. Why doesn't that bother you? Why doesn't that raise suspicion in you? Why aren't you smart enough to realize that CE 150 might be phony? Why must you be so stupid?  

And it's especially troubling in this case because you are on record as saying that WC finagled which shirt he wore. You think Oswald was guilty- that he locked and loaded on the 6th floor and then went on to shoot Tippit- but for some reason, they found it necessary to frame a guilty man by lying about which shirt he wore to work and whether he changed it. 

So why, at the same time, are you accepting, without question, the authenticity of CE 150?  

Oswald's shirt was strikingly different from most shirts. THEY WANTED TO HIDE THAT FACT. That's why they came up with CE 150. 

Tell me something, bpete: You seem to be willing to attribute mistakes and even subterfuge to the Warren Commission. You said this:

You referred to the bus and cab rides as being "faked." That's the word you used: faked. Now faking is never innocent, right? Faking always involves deviousness and deception, right? So, you are not beyond accusing the Warren Commission of wrong-doing and foul play. But, my question is: how do you distinguish the true from the false? After realizing that the WC faked the bus ride and the cab ride what makes you think they didn't engage in foul play in their handling of the Doorman issue?  


Why would they get rid of the distinctive lay of Oswald's shirt? Duh! It's because of the distinctiveness of the lay of Oswald's shirt. And it's because of the Altgens photo. If people saw him decked out the same way as the Doorman, with the shirt sprawled open and the white t-shirt exposed, they'd put 2 and 2 together and realize that it was the same guy. The WC didn't want to encourage that. They didn't want to foster that realization. And that's why they misrepresented Oswald's shirt. They had to hide the fact that Oswald was standing in the doorway. 

For people who aren't brain-dead or on the take, the above collage clicks in their brain as a match. It screams a match! I'm telling you, I am embarrassed for you- having to look at this and deny that it's a match. And you're a fucking whore to do it too.  

I don't know how much they are paying you. But maybe Jennifer is a high-maintenance woman, and you need the cash. 

Now cite one prominent researcher who has claimed that this shirt below is the one that Oswald wore to work on 11/22. Obviously, the Warren Commission didn't claim it. They claimed that CE 150 was the shirt that he wore. So, now I need you to cite somebody- besides yourself- who makes the claim.

Just give me a name, Azzhole. Don't talk around in circles; provide a name. And I don't mean someone who agrees that that shirt was found among his possessions. I'm not disputing that. I mean someone who claims that that shirt is the one he wore to work on 11/22 and changed out of when he reached his room on Beckley. 

As far as I'm concerned, the ONLY images of Oswald's shirt that we can count on as being accurate are the ones in which we can see him in it. I reject every other one. From the beginning and all along, they have refused to be honest in displaying Oswald's shirt. 

Lies. Lies. Lies. You accept them because you're paid to accept them. I don't know who is paying you, whether it is the CIA or someone else. But somebody is paying you. 

I never said his arrest shirt was the only shirt he owned. I never said they didn't find other clothes in his room.  But, you are going beyond that. You are claiming this to be the shirt that Oswald changed out of. Now, I need you to cite one other person who has made that specific claim before you- not that the shirt was found among his possessions but that it's the shirt he changed out of. 

And one more thing: you need to explain why he changed out of an intact shirt with all its buttons into a tattered and torn one with buttons missing. 

Seems like a strange behavior to me. Now watch the azzhole say that all the damage to the shirt was done at the theater. Including the hole in the right elbow that Mary Bledsoe saw on the bus? 

Now get something straight, Killer: you are not worming out of this. I won't allow it.  You claimed that that shirt was the one Oswald wore to work on 11/22. I need the name of someone besides you in the JFK assassination research field who has made that specific claim. Not that the shirt was found among Oswald's possessions, but that he wore that specific shirt to work on 11/22. 

Have you go that? Do you understand? Are we clear? Now, cough it up.