Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Here is something that is heartening. The Tom Hanks movie Parkland, which was based on Vincent Bugliosi's book Reclaiming History was an utter bomb at the box office. Worldwide, it didn't even take in one million dollars.

Incredibly, they made the movie for just $10 million.

What, were the actors working for free? Why? 

I like Tom Hanks. I think he's a great actor, and I'm sure he's a very nice guy. BUT, HE IS DEAD WRONG ABOUT THE JFK ASSASSINATION, AND HE NEEDS TO BE TOLD. It was a coup d'etat. Johnson, Hoover, Bush, Dulles, McCloy, were behind it along with Texas oil men like Hunt and Murchison. Oswald was just the patsy- nothing more. The official story is a complete and utter lie, fashioned with altered photographs, altered movies, and more. 

Would a JFK movie that told the truth have done better at the box office? I should think so. I seem to recall that there was a movie called JFK which did a whole lot better than that in 1990. 

People do not want to spend good money to be propagandized. Maybe for free on television they'll put up with it, but not at the movies. 

Tom, you often play heroic men, as in Saving Private Ryan. You should be a hero in real life and get on the right side of JFK truth.  Oswald was innocent. He was standing outside in the doorway during the shooting. And that is as plain as day. We can see him there, his clothes, his stance, his build, and more. It can't possibly not be him.