Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

That's my point, MacRae. You've been calling Oswald a murderer for a long time, and when you said he caught a glimpse of Shelley before going up to the 6th floor to lock and load, you were calling him a murderer. But, as recently as a few days ago, you denied it. You are  liar. 

Oh, and I know full well that Shelley denied seeing Oswald between 11:50 and when he saw him at the Dallas PD. But, that's simple to explain: Shelley, like you, was a liar. 

William Shelley was Army Intelligence during WW2, and he joined the CIA from its inception in 1947. Are we supposed to believe that he wound up at a company that distributed Dick and Jane books for little kids? The TSBD was a CIA front company. Book distribution was their cover for their illegal activities, including murdering the President of the United States. Read The Spider's Web: The Texas School Book Depository and the Dallas Conspiracy by William Westin. It's a great book. 

William Shelley was briefly arrested for the assassination, although charges were dropped very quickly. That came out in interviews with Elize Glaze which occurred in the 1970s and were reported by Westin. 

I wonder what Oswald thought when he got to the TSBD and found his old buddy from the Civil Air Patrol, Bill Shelley, and when he found out that the building was owned by David Byrd, the founder of the Civil Air Patrol. I think he had to know that there was more to this company than Dick and Jane book distribution. And I imagine it was the same for him and Jaggars Stovall, another company with CIA connections. Oswald was a US government agent. He was on the payroll of the FBI.

And you know who Mike Williams is because from the beginning you've had his link on your site:

 And yes, I can name one person who identified Billy Lovelady as someone other than Doorway Man: Billy Lovelady.

There is a mark there. Not you, and not anyone else can deny that, and not you nor anyone else has offered any explanation of how that mark got there, other than Lovelady drawing it. And we know that he did draw an arrow on that photograph. And if you look closely, you can see the impression of Frazier's arrowhead, even though it was black and black. Therefore, the argument that we can't see Lovelady's arrow because of the lack of contrast is bogus. Besides, whose idea was it for him to draw an arrow in the black with a black instrument? That wasn't his idea. That was Joseph Ball's idea. Isn't the whole idea when you draw something to make it visible? Not in this case because Joseph Ball didn't know where Lovelady was going with his arrow, and until he did, he was not going to take any chances. That's also the reason why he didn't just point to Doorman and ask Lovelady to name whom the person was. Why didn't he do that? Why'd he play the arrow game instead? Same reason.

And if you don't like that analysis, MacRae, it's very simple: you just have to find Lovelady's arrow elsewhere. I have been telling you to do that for about a year. But, you haven't done it because you're incapable of doing it. You know very well that there is no other arrow there. And it doesn't bother you despite the implications. And that's because you're not only Mike Williams' bitch, you're the bitch of the people who are paying you to dis-info about JFK, trying to protect the real killers. That makes you scum in my book, MacRae. 

Think there's another arrow pointing to Doorman drawn by Lovelady? Then find the fucking thing, MacRae. You have no excuse not to, other than the fact that you are a blood-soaked Kennedy-killer.