Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, only one interrogator of Oswald, Will Fritz, was asked about Oswald's alibi, and he lied, claiming that Oswald said he was eating lunch- bringing food to his mouth- during the very moments of the shots, and in the company of other employees: which was complete utter balderdash.  

I wrote to John Armstrong about this, and he pointed out something both obvious and sublime: why weren't Oswald's interrogations recorded? He said that even newspaper reporters recorded every word that Oswald spoke, yet, we are supposed to believe that police officials didn't. 

In a murder investigation, what is the #1 question you have for the suspect? It's where were you at the time of the murder. Right? 

So, since there were no written transcripts of the interrogations, taken perhaps by a stenographer, and there were no recordings, shouldn't the WC have asked everyone who attended those sessions what Oswald said in his defense? 

It's well known that Oswald denied his guilt. How many times do we have on tape him saying vociferously, "I didn't kill anybody!" "No, I didn't! I didn't shoot anybody." "I emphatically deny these charges!" etc, An alibi would spontaneously come out of a man like that. So, he must have given one and repeatedly, yet it has been suppressed. 

We have Fritz writing down that he said he was out with Bill Shelley in front, but we just got lucky with that. Fritz had no intention of sharing that. He went to his death not sharing it. It was over a decade after his death that somebody else released them to the ARRB. And it may be that even the ARRB was reluctant to release them but had to. They weren't exactly good guys either, if you believe Douglas Horne.

Now, here is an absolutely brilliant analysis of the whole interrogations notes question.

It points out, for instance, that Hosty first said that he destroyed his hand-written notes, but it turns out that he didn't. It also recognizes that Hosty never volunteered anything about the incident at the Dallas FBI office where Oswald stormed in making threats. He left it out completely. The reason why it got brought up at his testimony is because there was a record of Oswald having apologized to him for the letter he sent him. So, that naturally led to, what letter? And of course it was the letter that Hosty destroyed. 

 http://jfklancer.com/pdf/haappanen-notes.pdf

And likewise, in the first Fritz notes, Fritz wrote down that Oswald admitted writing the Russian Embassy and to Hosty, but the reference to writing Hosty was never included in Fritz' formal submitted notes, just as the reference to Out with Bill Shelley in front was never included.

The US government refuses to post online Appendix 11 which includes various reports of the interrogations of Oswald. They describe it but leave it vacant. 

http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/appendix-11.html

Is the content available piecemeal online elsewhere? 

Here is a copy of Hosty's hand-written notes. Notice that there isn't one word about Out with Bill Shelley in front even though Hosty was there when Oswald said it. And he didn't provide any other alibi for Oswald either.

http://jfklancer.com/Hosty_Notes.html

The suppression of Oswald's alibi was conscious, systematic, and Machiavellian.