Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The word is out that Oswald was in the doorway, and not Duncan MacRae, nor any other Op, can stop it. This collage alone smites them dead, as there is no plaid in Doorman's shirt. 

Here's a guy on Youtube promoting Oswald in the doorway, and he is also promoting Black Hole Man as the real Lovelady, which he was.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ub1lOfXUjo

Remember, that Black Hole Man is the figure that Lovelady drew his arrow to to indicate himself.

Notice how the angle of the little arrow is exactly the same as the angle of the big arrow drawn by Frazier. Lovelady took his cue from Frazier. Visually, it guided his hand. 

Here's another video, again establishing Lovelady as Black Hole Man and Oswald as Doorway Man.  It includes a good depiction of what the Altgens photo probably looked like before they altered it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiaF-IFxIPk

Yes, of course the face of Black Hole Man was visible. Nobody's face gets driven to black just from having their hands atop their head. 

Here we have John Kimbur's work on Oswald in the doorway:

http://johnkimber.wordpress.com/2012/12/09/oswald-shown-in-doorway-as-jfk-was-shot/

Here we have the write-up on Orwell Today:

http://www.orwelltoday.com/readerjfkoswaldlovelady.shtml

See below the photo of the man standing in the doorway:

Notice the shirt - it's somewhat textured and solid in colour - open above the waist - forming a "V" over a white T-shirt.

Now see the photo of Oswald as he's being taken into the Dallas Police Station - it's the same style, colour and pattern of shirt and he's wearing it the same way.

Now observe the shirt of the man sitting in the chair as a handcuffed Oswald - back facing the camera - is taken past him.

That man is Billy Lovelady, a fellow employee at the TSBD. Notice the shirt he's wearing. It's a different pattern - huge squares - and it's buttoned to the neck. This is two hours after the assassination - with both men wearing the same clothes they had on at work that morning.

An employee of the TSBD testified before the Warren Commission that he was Lovelady's boss and that he saw him sitting on the Book Depository steps as the JFK motorcade went by, not standing in the doorway. Other witnesses, as well, testified that they saw Lovelady sitting on the steps.

Above is a photo of Billy Lovelady standing on the steps of the TSBD after the motorcade went by. Notice the distinctive stripes of his shirt and the way he's wearing it - buttoned to the top. Don't be fooled by the photo taken eight years later in 1971 - of him wearing that same shirt buttoned differently - ie open at the neck over a white T-shirt. That's not how he wore it in Dallas on November 22, 1963.

In spite of this overwhelming evidence proving it was Oswald standing in the TSBD doorway - photographs and witnesses - the government-appointed Warren Commission (ordered by a president who benefited from JFK's death - Lyndon Johnson - and a future president sitting on the commission - Gerald Ford - and also an ex-CIA director who'd been fired by JFK - Allen Dulles) concluded that the man in the doorway was "lookalike Lovelady".

The Warren Commission didn't even call Lovelady to the stand to get his side of the story which was - as he had stated to the FBI - that he'd been sitting on the Book Depository steps eating his lunch - wearing a long-sleeved red plaid shirt - as JFK's motorcade went by. He's also on record saying he heard gunshots coming from the Grassy Knoll.

Here we have the work of Mike Rivero on Oswald in the doorway:

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/JFK/postphotos.html

Whose side was Harold Weisberg on in the Doorman debate? Ours! Weisberg was such a powerful voice AGAINST the Lovelady claim, it is very likely that some of the phony evidence, to make it appear to have been Lovelady, was concocted in response to him.

No one did more than Harold Wiesberg to make it known that Lovelady claimed to have worn a red and white, vertically striped, short-sleeved shirt and blue jeans. It's what Lovelady told the FBI, and it's what the FBI told the Warren Commission.

This was a report to the WC from the FBI that was composed by the two FBI Special Agents who oversaw his 2/29/64 photo shoot. In fact, the agents initialed it on that very day. Look at the bottom of the letter. That's how fresh it was in their minds that he said that. And, it was the shirt he wore to the photo shoot. And, he posed in it, for pictures, unbuttoned. 

The exact statement was, "He stated he was wearing a red and white vertical striped shirt and blue jeans." It's underlined below.

Weisberg: "Lovelady advised that, on the day of the assassination of President Kennedy, November 22, 1963, at the time of the assassination and shortly before, he was standing in the doorway of the front entrance to the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) Building, 411 Elm Street, Dallas, Texas, where he is employed. He stated he was wearing a red and white vertically striped shirt and blue jeans." (Photographic Whitewash, page 194)

Then, there was the Grand Jury Proceedings, April 27, 1967, where Weisberg was questioned by Jim Garrison. Harold said:

"The FBI got Billy Lovelady at their Dallas office on February 29, 1964, and they said, "What shirt were you wearing that day?" - I have that report - let me see- he said: 'I was wearing a red and white vertical striped shirt.' I got 3 pictures taken in that vertical striped shirt, and he cannot be the Man in the Doorway." 

That's right! The great Harold Weisberg said that Billy Lovelady could NOT be the Man in the Doorway of the Altgens photo. 

Why would Lovelady have posed in that shirt for pictures- with it UNBUTTONED- unless it was the same shirt? It was obviously an attempt to duplicate the look of Doorman. And, it could not have been Lovelady's idea to unbutton it. The FBI Special Agents must have told him to do it. But, what would have been the point unless it was the same shirt? And why didn't Lovelady say something then, such as, "I can unbutton it if you want, but you gotta know that this was not the shirt I wore." But, he said no such thing. 

And then, there was the historic phone call Weisberg received from Mrs. Lovelady in which she tried to revise what Lovelady had said about which shirt he wore. But first note: isn't it odd that she called and not Lovelady himself? But when she tried to tell Weisberg that Lovelady wore a checked shirt, Harold's response to her was that Doorman's shirt was NOT checked. (Photographic Whitewash, page 294) 

Now, this is really going to blow your mind: In response to Mark Lane's "A Citizen's Dissent" Harold Weisberg wrote:

"Mrs. Lovelady phoned me to report that the FBI had not asked her husband to wear the shirt he had on November 22, 1963 and then to say he had thereafter worn it only once because she had put it away. That once was when Bob Richter (of CBS) photographed him. That shirt is even more unlike the shirt on the man in the doorway in the Altgens picture cited above (and this, incidentally, is the same picture about which Mark (Lane) had protested, "what difference does it make" when I proved its alteration by the Warren Commission, which does not have the original and never printed an uncorrupted copy.) I know. I have the pictures CBS supressed, complete with Bob Richter in the foreground, and in full and very vivid color. It has the largest black and red squares I have ever seen in a shirt."

Weisberg was making the obvious point that Doorman's shirt does not display large squares. And the larger point Harold was making is that REGARDLESS OF WHICH SHIRT LOVELADY WORE, IT WAS NOT A MATCH TO DOORMAN. Doorman's shirt was not striped, nor did Doorman's shirt did have large checks. It's what Harold Weisberg told Mrs. Lovelady, and it's what he told the whole world. 

Whether Lovelady wore a striped shirt OR a checked shirt, Doorman's shirt was neither striped nor checked. That was Harold Weisberg's message to the world. 

And note above that Harold Weisberg was the first to cry photographic alteration. He said in regard to the Altgens photo, "I proved its alteration by the Warren Commission." What part of that don't you understand, MacRae? 

Harold Weisberg was one of us. He was on our side. In spirit, he IS a senior member of the Oswald Innocence Campaign. And that is why his intellectual and material heir, Gerald McKnight, is a senior member of the Oswald Innocence Campaign. And I have no doubt that Harold Weisberg is looking down at us with approval. And we shall not let him down. 

The blood-soaked, brain-splattered killers will continue to lie about what Harold Weisberg said in 1967- that Billy Lovelady was NOT the Man in the Doorway while Lee Harvey Oswald was. But, they are dead men walking because this is unstoppable. There is no plaid on Doorman's shirt; and there are no stripes on Doorman's shirt. And that puts the truth in our corner. And this collage is yet another cross to the Bloody Draculas who slaughter JFK daily.