Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Why does bpete refuse to find Lovelady's arrow? He insists that the one I found is not valid. But, isn't the best way to prove that to find the real one? 

And you can't say it's not visible. Joseph Ball told us that it's visible. He said: "You have an arrow in the white and one in the dark pointing to you." Would you say that if you couldn't see the one in the dark? At all? 

And if bpete is so sure that Lovelady drew the arrow to Doorman to indicate himself, it limits where the arrow could be severely. Frazier drew an arrow coming in from the left. We can assume that Lovelady would not draw his arrow right on top of Frazier's. Therefore, he'd likely draw it on the other side of Frazier's. Something like this?

I drew it in grey just to make it stand out boldly. It wouldn't stand out as bold as that if it were black, but it would stand out some. 

For 50 years, it's been common for people to identify Frazier's arrow as Lovelady's. I am proud to say that I have been instrumental in forcing the recognition that that is not the case. Some have been willing to admit the truth that it's Frazier's. But, it's not enough. They have to find Lovelady's arrow. 

I have repeatedly demanded that bpete do that: find Lovelady's arrow. And although we are bitter adversaries, my demand is not unreasonable even for a bitter adversary, as it follows from the logic of the situation. 

But, bpete has not only not found Lovelady's arrow, but he hasn't even addressed why he hasn't found it, why he hasn't looked for it, why its missing-in-action status doesn't bother him. 

If you look at Frazier's arrow- the part that is in the black- you do see it. It's not as easy to see as the part in the white, but it's there. Surely, a part of Lovelady's arrow would be visible- if not the whole thing. 

And how strange is it that Joseph Ball didn't have the arrows distinguished at the time? I mean, perhaps, having them put their initials over their arrow?

And if Ball was going to have Lovelady draw his arrow in the black, why not have him use a writing instrument that would provide contrast? Does it not seem that Ball deliberately tried to make Lovelady's arrow so that it would not be seen? And think about how derelict that behavior was for an investigating lawyer. The entire handling of this does scream foul play. 

I stand by my discovery of Lovelady's arrow. He drew it very small within the space of Black Hole Man's arms where just a tiny line overlapped the flesh-colored forearm. There was nothing they could do about that once it happened, but it wouldn't surprise me if Ball or someone took a felt pen and smeared through the head of the arrow in the black space. 

But, my point is that this is an honest broker question: that if you don't accept the arrow that I found, then find the real one because it has to be there. But, bpete hasn't done that, and he hasn't explained why. He has darted the question- with all that that implies. 

To anyone who doesn't like my arrow, you have to find Lovelady's real arrow. And it's not because I demand it; it's reality that demands it. I'm just pointing it out.