Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, we can forget about the epaulets for now, but everything else still holds. Your problem is that you have to disprove EVERYTHING, not just one thing, whereas, I only have to be right about one thing and my thesis holds. 

The left epaulet of the first cop was riding pretty high, and it seems to me that it would have been visible from the rear.

But, we'll just consider it a question mark and not count it. Who needs it? There's plenty else.

There is the height and size differential between the cop and Oswald. 

And it wasn't just to Oswald. The second cop was taller in comparison to the other men as well.

The frame on the right is the first one showing that big cop. Notice how much taller he is THAN EVERYBODY. But, there isn't much discrepancy on the left. 

Besides the height, there is the build. The first cop was somewhat portly, the second cop not.

And, it also included the face. The first cop had a rounder face. This was due to his extra weight but also to his younger age. When we are younger, our faces are naturally more round and full, and we lose that as we get older. 

Of course, that also shows the difference in the height comparison. I also have a side view of the first cop.

The man on the right has an older face. He was an older man.

The second thing is the weird interface between the big cop and Oswald in the latter footage. 

On the right, that is just plain weird. The big cop's arm disappears into a sea of light brown, but look how weird Oswald's arm looks. Look how weird his arm looks. It looks fake, like it was painted on. And what is that piece to which the arrow points? It looks artificial. And look how low Oswald's elbow is on the right. Everything about that interface is WRONG. Fatol was the first to point it out, and Fatol was right. 

And finally, the mere presence of that goofy clock/coat rack screams bloody murder. What is it doing there, Backes? It was the detectives' squad room. It shouldn't have a clock/coat rack. 

How did that get there, Backes? It seems rather goofy. Did the city of Dallas order freestanding clock/coat racks for all its offices and police rooms? Then show me some more of them. And who could possibly need such a big clock in such a small room? Who would order one? There's a clothes rack in front of them along the wall. That wasn't enough? They needed a coat rack too? And that shirt of Oswald's just doesn't look real, and neither does his arm, the way it's going. It appears to be going behind his back, but it couldn't have been. It just doesn't add up. 

If that shirt is fake, as it appears to be, then it means that at that time, Oswald was in just a t-shirt, as he was for much of the time. And that means that it was a different scene. And if that clock is fake, which it appears to be since it doesn't belong there, then that means that it was put there to sell the idea that it was 2:00, which means that it wasn't 2:00, which means that it was another time. 

So, raise all the doubt you want about the epaulets. But, then start addressing the other issues. Because, I only need one disconnection; that's all; while you have to justify and rationalize everything.