Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

How many times do I have to tell you, Moron, that it's the same guy, the same picture. There is no primary photo and no secondary photo. There is only one photo, which is displayed in two different ways.  

And now the Ultimate Technobabbler is doubting the technical ability to do it. It couldn't have happened because the technical means to do it did not exist. What an asshole. 

Well, if the means didn't exist, how did this result come about? What is your explanation for the existence of two different versions of the same frame?

 And remember that this wasn't something that was done in 1963 or 1964. It must have been done after 2009 because the unaltered one on the left came out in 2009. At least, I don't know of it being seen prior to the 2009 release of 3 Shots.

Backes, in your own feeble way, explain the existence of the above two forms. You're not saying that I made that slimmed version on the right, are you, that he only exists because of me? Because if you're saying that, I can refer you to the Youtube video which shows him. Go to 38:22.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVkapOpc8EA

And here's how he looks:

And this frame came from Robin Unger:

So, I didn't do it. The two versions exist, and I had nothing to do with it. We are staring at the face of evil.