Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

No, Backes. There is no way that a hand-held light could cast illumination on one figure alone. And remember who the figure is: Billy Lovelady. So, there is no reason why anybody would want to illuminate him. At the time, he was nobody. He was just a warehouse worker who was brought in to make a statement.

That ghost-like look of Lovelady in this particular frame was not the result of any photographer with a hand-held light. And why the hell would anybody want to illuminate Billy Lovelady? And compare it to this frame:

Notice what's missing from this frame- the big cop in front. Oh, he's there, but he's staying tucked to the left, though you can see Oswald's head. You see, they decided to just walk straight into the back wall instead of turning right. But, there's nothing ghost-like about this Lovelady. 

So, here we have Lovelady twice, at 2:00 PM. Was he thick and muscular as on the left, or thin and scrawny as on the right? Was his shirt sprawled open as on the left or flush against his chest as on the right? Was his hair combed straight back as on the left or combed over as on the right? Did he had big ears as on the left or small ears as on the right? Did he have his whole massive forearm resting on the table down to his wrist as on the left, or was his scrawny forearm hanging off the table except for his elbow as on the right? And most important for this discussion, was he more illuminated than his surroundings as on the right, or was his illumination neutral compared to his surroundings as on the left?

And look at the examples that Backass gives of these hand-held lights:

Well, obviously we are not talking about anything like that in the Squad room. 

Do you have any reason to think that such a focused source of light was being held by anybody in that room? Where's the flash, Backes? 

And why in A Year Ago Today is it blurred to this:

And you can't blame Youtube, Backes, because you've already shown us that Youtube is capable to displaying these old footages crystal clear:

You said that came from Youtube, so you can't blame Youtube.

The fact is that they deliberately blurred the movie because they were trying to pass off these two guys off as the same guy:

They're not the same guy, Backes. And no photographer with a hand-held light can make them the same guy. Lovelady looks illuminated on the right compared to his surroundings because they weren't his surroundings. He was in a different place at a different time with different lighting. Then he was superimposed into the film.  That's what happened. And your recourse to hand-held lights like these to explain it is stupid. 

That is not it, Backes. And only stupid people like yourself will think so. Furthermore, I knew ahead of time that that was what you were going to say. You're stupid, Backes. You were born stupid, and you're going to stay that way. 

Lovelady was not in that squad room, and these are different men, Backes. They're different men, different men, different men.