Backes, let's see the Youtube link where the KRLD frames came from. Because, I have never seen old footage that clear and sharp on any Youtube video. And no matter what method you used to download them, you can't make something better quality than what you started with. You can brighten it, and you can do other things, but you can't add pixels to it. You can't add more details. It is what it is.
You're big on citing sources, so cite the source for this. Don't do it for me; do it for your readers.
And notice that he admitted that he could not have downloaded all those frames between 9:30 and 11:00. Check. So, now he's saying that he did it previously and had them in a file?
It's more bull shit. If he had them previously, he'd have shown them previously. But frankly, NOBODY would have gone to the work and trouble of downloading so many frames- so many close frames, where there was hardly any difference between the previous one.
What was the point of downloading all three of these? Aren't they about the same?
Why 3? Wouldn't one have sufficed? Why do all the work of making 3? And is he now claiming that he has a way of downloading a series of individual frames from a Youtube video? Is that what you're claiming, Backes? But, that doesn't even look like anything from Youtube. Youtube doesn't offer that as an option, to download frames from a video in a series. Backes is so full of shit, there's no room for the proscenium arches.
You did not get the above from Youtube, Backes. YOU HEAR ME? Now, where'd you get it?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.