Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

As explained, this man was exactly where he SEEMS to be: on the sidewalk east of the Depository entrance. There is NO place else he could have been. The data that we are receiving from this image is accurate:

But, what about the other one? What about his alleged alter-ego in Towner? Let's take a look:

So, we have Tina herself reprising her role from 11/22/63. And somebody has photographed her, someone who was undoubtedly east of her. But, don't make the mistake of thinking that the angle that we're seeing to the Obelisk was Tina's angle. It is the angle to the Obelisk of the photographer who took the picture. Her angle had to be less. So basically, she was across the street from the Obelisk: a little east of it but essentially, across the street. So, why would there be any problem in her capturing whatever was going on over there? Did not this photographer capture what was really going on over there? Are not all the people we see on Elm Street, including those in front of the Obelisk, really there? No one would assign any shifts, right? No one would suggest that anyone in the modern photo "was no more there than blah, blah, blah" right? That would be completely ridiculous, would it not? 

So now, let's look at just the cut-out from the Towner film:

  
If anyone were to suggest that the man in the Fedora hat wasn't really there, in front of the Obelisk, as he appears to be, they would be forced, by logic, to draw the same conclusion about all those other people who are next to him. He is not alone. He is immersed in a crowd. If he's not there, then they're not there. Or as Robin Unger would put it: "there not there". Just kidding. 

What kind of Bizarro World would it be to claim that all those other people were there (and of course we know from other films and photos that upper Elm Street was lined with spectators) but that the Fedora Man only "seems" to be there because of Tina Towner's "perspective." Well, that would be the Bizarro World of Joseph Backes. Proscenium Joe plays the word "perspective" like a trump card.   

The bottom line is that there is no way that these two men can be the same man:

Proscenium Joe likes to make reference to the other Fedora Man in Altgens, how he appears to be close to the entrance of the Depository:

Not really. And, it's really not hard to place that Fedora Man. We know he's between the Obelisk and the Entrance, right? And, he is well west of the tree. And we have a picture of all that:

He must have been on the paved incline behind the sidewalk proper. He's there to watch the motorcade, right? So, he wouldn't have been too far back. So, it's not hard to narrow down his location. Even if we don't get it exact, we have a pretty good idea where he was. But, when we look at this guy:

Where else could he be other than where he seems to be, which is in front of the Obelisk? And what does Tina Towner's "perspective" have to do with it when she was just across the street? She was further up a little bit but not much. It was all happening at the top of Dealey Plaza, and it's not a big place. And in this case, there is no other perspective. He is in front of the Obelisk. She was across the street. There is no other way of sizing it up. There is no reason to think that he, singularly, wasn't really there while everyone else  we see was. That is ridiculous. It's just a backesism. It's like the "other African-American" for whom he has no picture. He just pulls things from out his ass. 

Both these men are exactly where they appear to be. They are not the same man, and they, of course, are not in the same place.

And that Joseph Backes continues to allege that they are the same man only shows what a clown, buffoon, and moron he is.