Unger, you keep saying that the guy was not in front of the facade, that there was a "great distance" between him and the facade. But, Joseph Backes makes the same claim about the guy in front of the Obelisk in Towner. He says there was a great distance between him and the monument, that he was no more in front of it than blah, blah, blah.
So, that can only mean one thing, Unger: that you and Backes are claiming the opposite of each other.
What is the matter with you people that there isn't a shred of honesty among any of you? You won't even admit the obvious, that they are saying opposite things. If, according to Backes, the guy in front of the monument in Towner "was no more there" then there was a "great distance" between him and the monument. But, you're saying that the "great distance" was between the other guy and the facade. So, who is right, Unger? Should we assume that NEITHER of them is where he appears to be and that there is some 3rd spot where they merge into one man? Is that what you and Backes are claiming, Unger?
Well, if there is a 3rd spot, point it out to me. If, in reality, he WASN'T in front of the monument and he WASN'T in front of the facade, then where the hell was he?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.