Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 Mike Morgan just posted this fraudulent image on the left, in which someone used a black marker or paint to thicken Ruby's hairline in back, and they also enhanced Ruby's hair overall.

Ruby was practically bald. He had nowhere near as much hair as that. But notice despite what they did, that the two images are still very disparate. On Ruby, it doesn't even look like hair at the bottom. And on Bookhout on the right, it looks like hair, but it's a wig. There is no way that could be the real hair of Ruby or any other man at that time. It was 1963, and that hair is too long, too neat, and too orderly. It's orderly like a wig. So, on the right, we're seeing James Bookhout in a wig, and on the left, we're seeing a highly manipulated image of Jack Ruby. THIS IS NOT SUPPORTING OF THE OFFICIAL STORY. IT IS DAMNING OF IT.