Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 To those who recognize that the Single Bullet Theory is complete, utter nonsense, you’re right. But granting that, what happened instead? Once you drop the SBT, what does it default to? And how do we find out?

We find out by starting with what the autopsy doctors found. We can’t go to the Parkland doctors because they missed it completely.

In his summary, Humes said there was a 7 x 4 mm oval entrance wound in the upper right posterior thorax. He provided measurements of its location from the mastoid process and from tip of the right acromion process of the scapula. But, the anatomical landmark he needed to use for reference was the spine. So, why didn’t he locate it as per distance from the spine?

But fortunately, other doctors present did so, and they all said it was adjacent to T3.  All but one, that is; the exception saying it was next to T4.

Humes said that the angle of entry was 45 to 60 degrees. That is impossible because it would have meant the shot was taken from a helicopter. The angle from the 6^th floor was only 18 degrees. Humes probed the wound with his pinkie, and other doctors did too. It appeared to be shallow and end abruptly. Military officers would not let them dissect the wound.

When it was found out the next day that there had been a wound in his throat, it was decided that it must have been one continuous wound. But, they still had JFK’s body, so why didn’t they go back and confirm it?

But, never mind all that. What matters is that a shallow wound in JFK’s back is all they found. And there is no reason to think it was anything but that.

But, why wasn’t there a bullet in the wound? Some have said that it fell out, but absolutely not. The only way it could have fallen out was to go back out through the holes made in 3 layers of clothing, and that is impossible. But, two persons claimed that that’s what happened. One was a friend of the driver of the Secret Service car, Sam Kinney. After Kinney died, this friend said that Kinney told him that he found the bullet on the floor of the limo and that he put it on the stretcher. Later, the same claim was made by SS Agent Paul Landis, except he said he found the bullet stuck in the back of the limo seat.

We need to dismiss these lies because they are just part of the evil of the JFK assassination. There is no chance that either of them is true.

However, there is another theory that preceded either one of them. It is that the back bullet was removed at the “pre-autopsy.” David Lifton alleged it. But no, that isn’t true either, and for multiple reasons.

First, if the back wound had been tampered with, the autopsy doctors would have recognized it. Digging a bullet out of the body isn’t easy. You have to get forceps around the bullet and yank it out. And that tears and disrupts the tissue. They saw no signs of that.

But, the whole idea that there was a metal bullet lodged in there is absurd and impossible. The bullets form the Carcano rifle had a flight speed of 2000 feet per second.  If one struck him in the back at that speed and then came to rest in an inch and a half, that rate of deceleration would have been impossible. There is a lot of energy in a bullet traveling 2000 feet per second, which has to be dissipated before the bullet can stop. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. That’s Newton’s Third Law of Motion, and it applies. The bullet would act on the body, and the body would act on the bullet. And all that energy would have been taken out on both. A bullet stopping that fast would get severely deformed, and JFK’s back would get severely traumatized. That did NOT happen.

So, what did happen? What happened is that JFK was not shot in the back with a metal bullet. He was shot in the back with an ice bullet. And the reason the bullet didn’t go very far inside him is because it was ice.

Ice is hard, but it is also unstable.  “Ice shatters easily because when it experiences a rapid temperature change, the outer layer warms and expands faster than the inner layer, creating internal stress that causes cracks to form and spread quickly, essentially shattering the ice due to this ‘thermal shock’ phenomenon.”

Also: “Excessive minerals in the water cause ‘grain boundary cracks’ – where there are so many grains in the ice that it finds it easier to fracture than expand. Oxygen in the water similarly creates weak spots in the ice.”

Also, there is the fact that: “Hydrogen bonding in ice causes it to expand because when water freezes, the hydrogen bonds between water molecules arrange themselves in a crystalline lattice structure with open spaces, resulting in a lower density solid (ice) compared to liquid water, causing it to take up more volume and expand.”

We all know from practical experience that freezing causes water to expand because that’s what causes pipes to rupture when frozen. That’s why you have to drain the pipes or cover them sufficiently to prevent it.

So, there are multiple reasons why ice is hard but also unstable.

I have memories from childhood of digging ice cubes out of a tray and having one explode. It would startle me but also intrigue me because it would seem like the ice cube vanished. Actually, it exploded.

And that’s what happened to JFK, and in his case, it was deliberate. The ice bullet was formulated to enter his back and burst. And there is no doubt that it existed. It was laid out to the Church Committee in 1975 by CIA Director William Colby. You can read about it here:

https://allthatsinteresting.com/heart-attack-gun?fbclid=IwAR3vFu-FY6m_SMg7XJIjiwOG-JMafuKciu_kvsLgvNZDezqOJo3LDIt_3io

At the hearing, Colby referred to shellfish toxin being used because a huge stockpile of it was found- enough to kill thousands of people.  But, Kennedy’s reaction, as seen in the Zapruder film, suggests to me that it may have been strychnine that was used because of the way his muscles seized up. He went into tetanic spasm. And it was progressive. It got worse as he sat there. It started in his arms, where he couldn’t put them down. But then, his back and his neck seized up. 

He may have died even without getting the fatal head shot because the tetanic spasm may have spread to his respiratory muscles, and he would have suffocated. That’s how Jane Stanford died in 1905 when she was poisoned with strychnine.

But, the other weird thing is that JFK suffered a complete mental collapse. He couldn’t speak, and it wasn’t because of the throat shot. It was because his mind collapsed. It was like a chemical lobotomy. There were probably multiple toxic agents in the frozen cocktail.

It was a preparatory shot, taken from low in the DalTex building, soon after the limo made the turn from Houston to Elm. By the time of the Croft photo, he was already hit, and they had to alter that photo immensely to hide it. Just think: In the last 3 photos before the throat shot, which are Croft, Betzner, and Willis, JFK had stopped waving. Why? Because he had been shot in the back and was being affected by the toxic payload. They had to cut all that out of the Zapruder film with the help of the phony freeway sign.

I know that, upon first hearing this, it sounds far-fetched. But, read that article about the CIA heart attack gun. They had it in 1963, and there is no other scenario that fits the facts. A metal bullet could not have stopped as fast as that missile did in JFK’s back, leaving a shallow wound. It didn’t stop; it burst on penetrating, as it was designed to do. 

The purpose of this preparatory shot was to turn JFK into a sitting duck who would take no evasive action. And Jackie saw the effects of it. She told the WC that the first she knew that something was wrong was when she turned and looked at her husband and saw that “he had a quizzical look on his face.” I’m sure he felt very strange at the time, like he had never felt before, and massive changes were occurring rapidly in his body.   

There is no alternative to this scenario. It is what happened.