Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I  mentioned shortly ago that the David Wolper film, Four Days in November, shows a version of Lovelady sitting at the desk in the Homicide division, but it's only in the version of the film that we see online today. It does not mean that the original broadcast of Four Days in November, which was in 1964, included the Lovelady figure. I'm saying that they added him afterwards. 

It's highly unlikely that they got it done in 1964. The Warren Report didn't even come out until late 1964. And the whole big flak about Lovelady and which shirt he wore, whether it was long-sleeved and plaid or whether it was short-sleeved and striped, really didn't get started until Harold Weisberg started clamoring about it, which I believe was in 1966. They weren't going to mess with it unless somebody was making a stink about it, and that's always the case. 

So, the alteration of the film definitely came later. Hey, it's not as though anybody had a home copy of it to compare- or even that anybody around today who could possibly remember what it showed in 1964- so forget about that. 

And another example in which they did the same thing- modified the film long afterwards- is the 1964 WFAA program, A Year Ago Today. 

Here is the link to how they're showing it today, and you should go to the 39 minute mark to see the Lovelady clip.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNKMO7MbGgw

What it shows here definitely was not included in 1964. This version has the bait and switch, where it starts with DeNiro Lovelady  (the one seen in Three Shots That Changed America from the History Channel) . Then the big linebacker cop gets in the way taking up the screen. And when he steps aside, wahlah, the clip with the other Lovelady (the one from the Wolper film) begins. So, it's a splice-job, with the old and the new, except that the new comes first, then the old. 

And I think I can prove it. The showing of DeNiro Lovelady is very brief. I don't know how many frames it entails, but in practical terms, it's only one, meaning that you only get one chance to stop the film to capture the frame with Lovelady in it as a still:

  
That is essentially the same frame from the History Channel movie except that the latter is clear as a bell, and they didn't alter the aspect ratio to slim Lovelady and everyone else down.

You can clearly see that it's essentially the same frame, right? It's just that in the other one they blurred it, and they slimmed it. Right? Of course, my Kennedy-killing enemies are going to say that the differences are all innocent shit, but shit is what they're full of. There is nothing innocent about this or them.  It's the exact same frame blurred up and slimmed down. And since it's the same frame, we might as well refer to the latter one since it's clearer, and this is where the proof of fakery comes in.  

So, what I want you to do is notice that at this point Oswald has already passed Lovelady, but Lovelady hasn't budged. He hasn't turned to look at Oswald. A friend of his, a guy he works with day-in and day-out, is being arrested for killing the President of the United States, where he is now the most notorious assassin in the history of assassins. Yet, Lovelady is NOT looking at him. Lovelady is like a statue pointing left. He is not showing any interest in Oswald at all. 

Then the big linebacker cop gets in the way:

And then when he steps aside, the Wolper sequence with the other Lovelady begins.

You notice that Lovelady is already starting to turn right in order to follow Oswald, as you would expect him to do, and he is eventually going to turn all the way around to the right- and I mean really strain to keep his eyes on Oswald- with his neck really twisted- just to keep his eyes on Oswald. 

But the question is: why wasn't DeNiro Lovelady doing that? The big cop and Oswald had to walk by him. That isn't shown, and I understand why: it would have been very cumbersome if it really happened, which it didn't. For goodness sake, Lovelady would have seen them coming and gotten the hell out of the way. Who is going to just sit there and force cops to walk around you or step over you? It's ridiculous. But, the point is that Lovelady would have seen Oswald approaching and his interest in watching Oswald would have begun immediately. There would have been no delay. And that's why this image below is ridiculous:

Look where Lovelady is looking. Look where he is not looking, which is at Oswald. But, he had to see Oswald and the big cop approaching. The big cop and Oswald were first in line, so there was no obstruction to Lovelady's view. So, Lovelady could not have missed recognizing Oswald. He had to know exactly what was going on. So, why at this point was he turned the other way? What the hell is he looking at in lieu of looking at Oswald? What could possibly be causing the delay in getting his focus, his stare, his gaze, on Oswald?

I'll tell you what's going on: This is just a phony thing that they set up afterwards, a reenactment. And the star of this show is not Oswald, but Lovelady. They were showcasing Lovelady's plaid shirt- the one he didn't wear on 11/22/63. But, when they changed their story to this, after having maintained the other for so long, and having put it in writing, twice, they figured that words, a retraction, would not be enough; they needed a picture. So, they came up with this shit where they wanted to show us the shirt and show us Lovelady wearing it. They felt that they had a very good match to Lovelady this time- much better than Gorilla Man whom they used in the Martin film. In reality, it was a poor choice because this guy is way too muscular to be Lovelady or to be anyone who could easily be mistaken for Oswald- as they claimed for Lovelady. So, in fact, they blew it again, and that's why they had to slim him down later by altering the aspect ratio. 

But, at the time, they were proud of their work; they thought they had a winner; and they wanted to showcase him. And that's why they had him turned left: TOWARD THE CAMERA. He was the star of the show- the guy in the spotlight. They overlooked the fact that it conflicted with the story they were telling in which Lovelady surely would have been focused on Oswald from the very first glimpse.  

So, the fact that Lovelady is still turned left AFTER Oswald has already passed him screams FAKERY. This thing is a fraud, and it certainly did not exist in 1964. The DeNiro version DEFINITELY did not exist in 1964, and most likely, the other version didn't exist either. The odds are very great that what appeared in 1964 was just an empty desk.  The two Loveladys were added at different times later and in different ways. The original fakery was done by embedding the Lovelady figure into the film. The subsequent fakery, with DeNiro, which came later and probably much later, was done by way of a reenactment.  They went to a lot of trouble. But remember my rule: how far are they willing to go to keep the dastardly lie about JFK's murder going? To the moon and back, if necessary. There is NOTHING they won't do. They'll KILL again if they have to, and don't think I don't know it.