First, he tries to find fault with my claim that the image of FBI Lovelady confirms that he was wearing a red and white striped shirt, but it also shows that the FBI filled in his hair, since it doesn't match what we see on Mark Lane Lovelady:
But, it's really very simple: the FBI messed with his hairline, but they didn't mess with his shirt. They even stated in writing- twice- that he said "he was wearing a red and white striped shirt and blue jeans." So, at the time, they didn't mess with his shirt, nor did they see any need to mess with his shirt. But, they did mess with his hairline. Take a look at the progression:
Who are you going to believe, Mark Lane or the FBI, especially with that follow-up picture from CBS just 3 years later? Which shows the more likely progression?
There is more I can say about this, but I'll save it until the Wee Cock Sparrow bpete responds to this, which he'll regret.
There is more I can say about this, but I'll save it until the Wee Cock Sparrow bpete responds to this, which he'll regret.
Then, he attacks my attack of the Oswald-as-Prayer Man claim. Hey, that's funny when you consider that bpete places Oswald "locking and loading" on the 6th floor. So you see, he doesn't think for one second that Prayer Man was Oswald. So, why is he defending it? Just because he's lying asshole, that's why. He just likes to stir up conflict among CTs any way he can. Remember: bpete is a paid dis-info agent.
But, if you take a look, you can see that Prayer Man doesn't begin to compare to Oswald the way Doorman does.
We know that Oswald's outer shirt was sprawled open, exposing his t-shirt. Do you see that here? We know that Oswald was very slender- just 131 pounds. That's less than I weigh, and I'm lean, but I'm also shorter than he was. Look at the girth of the man above. Look at the girth of his mid-section. How could that possibly be Oswald? And bpete made no comment about this picture:
Oswald not only had to beat Baker to the lunch room, but he had to get there without being the least bit out of breath, which means he had to take his time. But, Baker was not taking his time. Baker was running. So, how could Oswald still be standing in the doorway when Baker arrived there?
Then, for some reason, bpete thinks there is a disparity in necks between Oswald and Doorman. There isn't.
Then, for some reason, bpete thinks there is a disparity in necks between Oswald and Doorman. There isn't.
Those necks correlate just fine. In fact, those two images match up in many ways just fine. Look how well the right ears match. Look how well the chins match. The mouth and nose and eyes match well too. It all matches except the hairline and the top of the head. But, that's easy enough to fix:
On the right is how Doorman looked before they messed with him.
bpete says that "Lovelady was most certainly dressed as in the photo on the right".
Oh really? But, we have a photo allegedly of Lovelady from shortly after the assassination. It is the image of him closest in time to the assassination. Does his shirt look at all like that?
So, why does bpete lie? It's because that is what Kennedy-killing liars do.
Then bpete denies that the right collars and furls match between Oswald and Doorman. But, we can add Lovelady to the mix as well. And this is the real Lovelady. It wasn't from the day of the assassination, but that doesn't matter because we are only talking about the shirt here, and the shirt didn't age, did it?
Which two match? And note that Lovelady had his shirt neatly pressed over, and there was most definitely an iron involved. Why else would the junction of the collar and the shirt be flattened down like a pancake? Don't collars normally stand up on shirts? But, he went to work on 11/22/63 to lay flooring. Do you really think that he ironed his collar down like that on 11/22/63?
And you, bpete are just being a stupid asshole when you claim that these two were the same person:
Or these two:
Or these two:
Or these two:
I guess Lee didn't care for that Russian cooking. Maybe he didn't go for borscht.
I'll finish with a quote from the late great Jack White:
"Any person of intelligence knows that John Armstrong is right."
Likewise, any person of intelligence knows that bpete is completely full of shit.
bpete says that "Lovelady was most certainly dressed as in the photo on the right".
Oh really? But, we have a photo allegedly of Lovelady from shortly after the assassination. It is the image of him closest in time to the assassination. Does his shirt look at all like that?
So, why does bpete lie? It's because that is what Kennedy-killing liars do.
Then bpete denies that the right collars and furls match between Oswald and Doorman. But, we can add Lovelady to the mix as well. And this is the real Lovelady. It wasn't from the day of the assassination, but that doesn't matter because we are only talking about the shirt here, and the shirt didn't age, did it?
Which two match? And note that Lovelady had his shirt neatly pressed over, and there was most definitely an iron involved. Why else would the junction of the collar and the shirt be flattened down like a pancake? Don't collars normally stand up on shirts? But, he went to work on 11/22/63 to lay flooring. Do you really think that he ironed his collar down like that on 11/22/63?
And you, bpete are just being a stupid asshole when you claim that these two were the same person:
Or these two:
Or these two:
I guess Lee didn't care for that Russian cooking. Maybe he didn't go for borscht.
I'll finish with a quote from the late great Jack White:
"Any person of intelligence knows that John Armstrong is right."
Likewise, any person of intelligence knows that bpete is completely full of shit.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.