You go straight to Hell, Unger. I've had nothing to do with the fake Czech emails, and that is an absolute fact. And I couldn't care less whether you discontinue your blog or not. Dealing with you is nothing but pest control.
I'll remind you that I have your email address, and you and I have exchanged a few emails in the past, although not lately. But, if I wanted to write to you, why would I bother going through some Czech email system? Furthermore, it's easy enough for me to communicate with you publicly right here. You think there is anything I would say to you privately that I couldn't say publicly? Well, you're wrong; there is nothing I couldn't say publicly. So, I don't need any Czech email system, and I don't know anything about any Czech email system.
But, I will take the liberty of using this image you recently posted of the doorway because there are some things I want to say about it:
And before you start beefing that I "stole" it from you, you, Backes, and bpete have been stealing my images and collages, including my reenactment photos, from the beginning. So, stop being a lying, two-faced bastard.
Now, what I want to point out about this is how shallow the landing was. And I say "was" because OIC senior member Larry Rivera has made a strong case that the landing was enlarged and deepened after the assassination.
You see where the median handrail reaches the landing, and Doorman was standing behind that. Look how cramped it was, and right behind him was the glass door. What does that say about the "shadows" that Wesley Frazier and Bill Shelley were supposedly standing in? And if you read Frazier's WC testimony, he was 2 or 3 steps up behind Doorman- even though Doorman was on the top level. Frazier said something similar at the 1986 mock trial. I think he's fucked in the head from all the pressure they put on him.
Look at the doorway now compared to how it was then. They deepened it- a heck of a lot. The question is: Why?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.