Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

It doesn't matter how small the film was. And as usual, you're a hypocrite. In your Lance Uppercut persona, you claim to be able to see plaid on that tiny image. 

You actually can't. Plaid entails horizontal and vertical lines crossing and forming boxes. There is not one single box on Doorman's shirt. 

Look how the fool puts Lovelady's shirt right along Doorman's right collar, which looks as plain and uniform almost as much so as a solid print. It has no lines at all going through it; it just looks a little grainy and mottled, that's all. It's certainly not plaid. And when we make the comparison to Lovelady, it's not even close. 

Compare the collars. Lovelady had flashy geometric pattern on his collar; does Doorman?  

But, my point is: look at what Lance Uppercut CLAIMS to be able to see from a film of 1.4 inch height. (Note: Just because the film is 1.4 inches high doesn't mean the print is 1.4 inches or qualitatively limited to 1.4 inches. All film is small, but there are lots of large photographs taken with film. I was sent an Altgens photo by the AP that is 2 1/2 feet high.)

And Lance rounded up support for his claim that Lovelady's plaid can be seen in Doorman's shirt: 

"It's Lovelady, you can see the plaid." (No you can't; not a single box is visible on Doorman's shirt). 

"The shirt looks plaid like Lovelady." (Again, not a single box is visible.)

"You can tell that the shirt the guy is wearing in the doorway is plaid." (No, because not a single box is visible.)

"Doorway Man seems to be wearing a checkered shirt like Lovelady." (No, it lacks a single check.)

"The shirt of the guy in the doorway is clearly checkered." (It clearly isn't because it has no checks."

But, my point is that Lance and his gang of Ops weren't stopped from yakking by the 1 1/4 inch film. 

That card is only played in response to me. It goes away completely when they want to claim stuff. Only I am hampered by it; not them. 

And notice that most of these OPs claim to be CTs. "It's Lovelady in the doorway but Oswald was innocent." That's what most of them said. It means that the vast majority of the people Lance rounded up think bpete is full of shit in saying that Oswald was up on the 6th floor locking and loading. 

And they are full of shit about the plaid pattern too. There is NO PLAID on Doorman's shirt. There is not a single vertical line, and even the horizontal markings do not correspond to the delicate white lines of Lovelady's shirt. And there are no boxes.  

But, Lance should know that I like what he's done because he's rounded up a lot of Oswald-innocent CTs. And their claims of seeing plaid on Doorman's shirt is a laughing stock. It's just stupid lip-flapping reinforced by numbers- a gang mentality, and in this case a really stupid gang.     

We'll give the last word to Harold Weisberg: "the Altgens photo shows no check." 

No check, Backes. That's Harold Weisberg. Harold Weisberg!