And why, since she went to the trouble of bringing that baby to the Presidential motorcade, and even Joseph Backes said she did it to give the kid a lasting memory, something significant that they shared and would remember, why the hell didn't she do what the other woman is doing, that is, turn the child towards the action and get it to participate?
Wouldn't she have done what the other mother is doing? Shouldn't we be seeing the face of the baby? What was the point of bringing the baby if it wasn't going to be involved in the occasion? Even Joseph Backes said that the idea was to share this event with her child. So, why isn't she doing it?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.