Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, the stupid son of a bitch is YOU. 

The question was: who was was Doorman? Was he Lee Harvey Oswald from November 22, 1963, or was he Billy Lovelady from November 22, 1963? 

That is the only question. All your shit about using images of Oswald and Lovelady that were the same age is laughably stupid. It wasn't a matter of determining how much Oswald and Lovelady looked alike. It was a question of determining which of them from November 22, 1963 was Doorman. That's from November 22, 1963, from November 22, 1963, from November 22, 1963. 

You, Backes, are the dumbest mother-pluck to ever get splattered with the blood of John Kennedy. Anyone with even average intelligence could see that I am right about this. It's only Oswald and Lovelady from the day of the assassination that need to be compared AND NOT TO EACH OTHER BUT TO DOORMAN. That is the issue, whether the person of Lee Oswald or Billy Lovelady on November 22, 1963 was the figure standing in the doorway in a photograph taken on November 22, 1963. 

Young Lovelady from the 1950s was definitely NOT standing in the doorway on November 22, 1963. He didn't exist any more. People change a lot from their late teens to their mid-20s.  So, why the hell look at him? Why compare him to Doorman? That made no more sense than using a 1950s image of Oswald to compare to Doorman. 

It's whacky that I should even have to explain it to you. People change throughout life. They are constantly changing. All that matters is how Oswald and Lovelady looked on November 22, 1963 because that is the day that the Man in the Doorway was standing there. Either he was Lee Harvey Oswald from November 22, 1963 or he was Billy Lovelady from November 22, 1963. 

You are stupid! You are dumb as a dolt! You've got shit for brains! You are helplessly and hopelessly incapable of rational thought.