Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Oh, Backes! You mean I can't compare myself to Doug Horne or Jack White? You mean their claims about the Zapruder film being altered and the Backyard photos being totally fabricated don't apply to anything I'm saying about the Altgens photo? Well, what about what Dr. Gerald McKnight is saying about the Altgens photo? Do I at least get to use that?

Don't bother answering, Backes, because I get to use it. I get to use it because I say I get to use it. 

And the point I made about the others is valid because once you grant that one image, any image, got altered for criminal purposes, it opens the door for other images having been altered on the same basis. It only stands to reason because if they would look at one image and ask, "What could we do to this to make it better for us?" why wouldn't they do it with others? 

I haven't been at this for 23 years. It's more like 23 months for me. But, in that time, I have won the favor of Mark Lane, David Wrone, Gerald McKnight, Vincent Salandria, James Fetzer, and many others I highly respect, such as Peter Janney, Phillip Nelson, and John Hankey. I'm very satisfied with the respect I've earned. 

So, this has been like a rocket ride for me, and let's put it this way: In the JFK community, there are only two kinds of people: those who know it was Oswald in the doorway, and those who know there is a raging controversy about it. And that's it; there's nobody else. And that's what I've accomplished in 23 months.