Take a look at this thread on McAdams' forum which I began. It has reached the point that none of those people are willing to respond to the evidence. General denunciations and wisecracks are all they can muster.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.assassination.jfk/RoUCQyNxFxk
It concerns a very concrete issue: whose face is it on Doorman?
The only way we can possibly find out is to compare Doorman's face to both Oswald's and Lovelady's. What else is there to do? There is nothing else.
So, what's to joke about? What's to get all snooty and disdainful and irate about?
These people are not interested in JFK assassination research, except to discourage it. And it's ridiculous because we have many images of Oswald and many claimed images of Lovelady. We even have multiple images of Doorman.
On the left, of course I have the corrected image of Doorman. But, that isn't theoretical; it is how he actually was. What we see on the right confirms it. He's not leaning; he is just standing there watching the motorcade.
I have stood in the center of that doorway, exactly where Oswald stood. And I can tell you that it's very easy to fix your eyes on Kennedy and Altgens- and it's a straight line to both of them. All you have to do is turn ever so slightly to your right. There is no leaning or lurching or contorting involved, and you certainly don't have to do anything with your shoulders. The idea that he was like this below is pure folly:
But, that is what you have to believe to accept the Altgens photo as being legitimate and unaltered.
He wasn't doing that. Nobody could or would. It's a monstrosity, and bpete hasn't come up with any kind of image to match it, nor will he.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.