Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

It is important to remember how distinctive human beings are. And even when we say that two people look alike, we don't mean that we have any trouble telling them apart- unless they are identical twins. 

Remember that the individual features, say of a face, can't be grouped together. For instance, if two unrelated men have similar noses, there is no reason to assume they would also have similar eyes or similar ears or anything else similar. So, if their noses are very similar that's one chance thing that worked out, but if their ears are also very similar, that's a separate other thing that worked out. So, you would have to multiply the first chance by the second chance in order to determine how unlikely the match was.

And the whole idea that Oswald and Lovelady looked that much alike has always been exaggerated- and backed by lies. 

Of course, we can forget about the Lovelady impostors because they neither look like Oswald or Lovelady. And even the FBI photos of Lovelady from 2/64 are suspect. We should assume that they were doctored in order to produce a desired result. 

Are you aware that Billy Lovelady was like a chameleon? The range of diversity of his images is greater than for any other human being who ever lived. Here is an image of him that was included in the HSCA Final Report:

 What the fuck? He doesn't look anything like any of the known images of Lovelady. 

Those are all Billy Lovelady? Jesus H. Christ! If alarm bells aren't going off inside your head, something is wrong with you.

But, when we get down to the likeness between Oswald and Doorman, it is riveting. 

Again: Jesus Fucking H. Christ! If that isn't the same man, then Heaven help us. Eyes, ear, nose mouth, chin, shape of the face, length of the neck, they all match. And then, as a separate, independent, external factor, the clothing matches perfectly. You do the Math on that. That is way too much likeness to think it was anything but the same man.

We are living in a Bizarro World. If this concerned anything but the JFK assassination, no one would begin to doubt that it's the same man. And, it would be even more striking if someone used Photoshop to restore Doorman's gouged-out face (caused by the placement of Black Tie Man in the photo) and got rid of the bogus Lovelady cap they gave him and put back Oswald's, including his hairline. 

We are dealing with a situation in which, geographically, Doorman is at least 80% Oswald and no more than 20% Lovelady. Which part do you think it was artificially imposed, the 80% or the 20%? And was there ever any chance that friends of Oswald got hold of the picture and added the 80% that is Oswald? Of course not. 

It's Oswald in the doorway, and it's glaringly obvious.