Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

bpete is such a child. If he had read John Armstrong, he would know that John places Robert Oswald deep within the Two Oswalds conspiracy. Robert Oswald took this picture of his brother Lee in 1958.

That was taken by Robert Oswald, yet you know it isn't the Lee Harvey Oswald we know. The Lee Harvey Oswald we know was never that big and stocky at any time in his life. There's a lot more that can be said about Robert Oswald's complicity in the Two Oswalds, but here's an idea for bpete: read John Armstrong. 

And as for Mark Lane, I'm sure that in the aftermath of the assassination he did NOT suspect anything about Two Oswalds and Two Marguerites. At the time, not even John Armstrong suspected anything about Two Oswalds and Two Marguerites. So, that doesn't matter at all. 

What matters is: what is Mark Lane saying today about the Two Oswalds and the Two Marguerites? I do not claim to know. I don't know what contact, if any, Mark Lane has had with the work of John Armstrong or what he thinks about it, and neither does bpete.

But, the case that John Armstrong makes is extremely strong. A good place to start is the Harvey and Lee website of Jim Hargrove, who is a friend and supporter of John Armstrong, and I know that John has had some input on the site. Here is the link:

http://harveyandlee.net/