Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The fact is that what the HSCA anthropologists did was a complete and total waste of time. They did a detailed comparison of the faces of Lovelady and Oswald which mattered for naught. What they needed to do was to compare each of their faces to Doorman's. 

But, they said they couldn't do that on account of Doorman's face being too "blurry". But, that's nonsense. You can see what you can see, and you can see plenty on Doorman. 

And neither did Robert Groden who investigated the Doorman issue for the HSCA bring any image of Oswald into it. 

Here is a collage published by the HSCA of some of the images that Groden used in his analysis, presumably the most important ones:

Notice that they referred to it as a "shirt analysis" but wasn't it really supposed to be a man analysis? It included Oswald's alleged shirt, but was it really his? It doesn't look like it to me. And what about the man himself? 

And notice that the collage includes two images of Lovelady, one from 1964 and one from 1976, and it also includes Gorilla Man, who was not Lovelady but rather an impostor. But, there is no image of Oswald. There is no image of Oswald in his arrest shirt, and there is no image of Oswald at all. He is missing. How can you do an analysis to identify a figure as being one of two men without including images of both of them? 

It was corrupt what Robert Groden did then, just as it is corrupt what he is doing now with his claim about Geneva Hine making change for Oswald during the shooting. 

That is ridiculous. Geneva Hine testified to the Warren Commission, and she said nothing about it. Never at any time did she say anything about it, not even on her death bed. Nor did Robert Groden say anything about it for 10 years after she died. She specifically said that at the time the Presidential limo passed, she was at the window watching it. 

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/hine.htm


The HSCA was a joke. It was just Government Whitewash II. That's all it was. And their conclusion- that Oswald did it, just as the WC said he did, including the Magic Bullet theory, except that he may have had a Grassy Knoll accomplice who shot and missed- is ridiculous. It was just an attempt on the part of the HSCA to throw the CT community a bone. And who most likely was responsible for the murder according to them? The Mafia. Not the CIA, not the FBI, not any US government agency or entity, but rather the Mafia. 

Could the Mafia get the motorcade route changed? Could the Mafia control the press, getting them to fall in line behind the official story from the start? Could the Mafia get a Presidential committee appointed that would back the official story to the letter?

And as I have been saying repeatedly, would the Mafia assign Lee Harvey Oswald to be a shooter, a man who had never shot at a moving target in his life except for when he went hunting in Russia with a shotgun? A shotgun!

We are in the Bizarro World, people, and we have been since November 22, 1963. And there are a lot of people trying to keep us there.