Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

When it comes to comparing noses, it really is important to use an image of Lovelady from very close to the day of the assassination. And it's because of what I said, that the nose continues to grow and change throughout life. 

So, we shouldn't use the image of Young Lovelady from the 1950s nor of Groden Lovelady from 1976. Instead, we'll use the image of FBI Lovelady from 2/64. 

We can see that Oswald had more flare to his nostrils. His nostrils were larger, and they were more visible. 

You might say that compared to Lovelady, Oswald had the nostrils of a race horse.

Oswald also had a more chiseled nasal tip and a softer, less prominent bridge, which resulted in a more triangular or pyramidal form. Lovelady's nose was more lumpen. 

When you keep those things in mind and then look at Doorman, you see that he had Oswald's nose. You see the larger, longer, more exposed nostril. You see the more refined tip, the more chiseled form. 

We ought to bring a cosmetic surgeon in, one who does a lot of rhinoplasty, and I bet you that he'd agree that that is Oswald's nose.

And while you're at it, look at Oswald's deformed left ear and compare it to the right which looks anatomical. What is the excuse for that? And look at the ridiculous angle of the left jawline on our right. That is opposite to what it should be. Compare it to the other side which looks normal.  

Show me one other person in the history of humanity who had a face shaped like that. It is impossible! This is bull shit! And look at the weird dropping off of his left shoulder. Compare it to his right, which looks normal. That's more bull shit! That photo was altered- severely- and it can't be denied. Stop the lies! Oswald outside!