Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Lance, you are crapping all over your dungeon. First, stop drawing lines on Doorman's shirt. Don't do it in any manner whatsoever. 

There are no vertical lines on Doorman's shirt, and there are no horizontal lines either that correspond to the ones on Lovelady's shirt. And there is not a single box on Doorman's shirt. Therefore, Doorman's shirt pattern does not match Lovelady's in the slightest.

You really are just flinging crap like a monkey when you say otherwise. 

And Lovelady's lines from 1971 are horizontal. 

And if it's not perfectly horizontal, it's damn close enough. 

And you're the one who added distortion to Wiegman Doorman. If you keep him small, he's not so bad.

You see how much better that is? And there is no plaid pattern on that shirt. 

Now don't go enlarging it. If you want to use it, you keep it small, you little shit.

And why assume that he's more upright than in Altgens? Why? For what reason? 

We are not seeing all of Doorman in Altgens, and your failure to realize that is the reason you drew such bogus diagonal lines. Doorman's left shoulder got cut off by the placement of Black Tie Man into the photo. 

When you take Black Tie Man out of the picture, you're left with a ridiculous contortion in Doorman with his shoulders all slanted. That isn't even possible. On the right is how he really was, with his left shoulder restored.  

I have been saying for a very long time that Doorman was standing mostly straight and neutral but with a little bit of right rotation, plus he was clasping his hands in front. 

The above picture doesn't have the shoulder restored, but it does show the parallel in the hand clasp. You'll notice on both sides that their left hand is actually beyond the plumb line from their chin. So, if you drop a plumb line from the chin all the way down, their left hand is on the other side of it. Oswald's habit was to grab his right wrist with his left hand, and we are seeing above the exact same configuration on both. Of course, it's the same man.  

And if you weren't so fucking stupid, you would know that nobody watches a parade leaning. They might watch it turned (rotated) a little bit but not leaning. It just isn't comfortable to lean. Maybe if you had something external to hold on to it would be alright. But Oswald was just holding on to himself. 

But thanks for admitting that in 1971, Lovelady stood in that doorway upright. That is correct. He was upright. And that's why is lines are horizontal. 

But no, Doorman had no slanting lines. You falsely drew them in, but it's all your artwork; nothing else. Oswald was mostly standing upright in the doorway in 1963. He was just turned a little to his right and clasping his hands; that's all. And it's a perfectly comfortable way to stand. 

You see, parades and motorcades tend to go on for a while, so people try to make themselves comfortable. Leaning isn't comfortable. Rotating a little is fine. And the frontal handclasp is also fine. But, what you are showing is not fine, and it did not happen. He wouldn't stand like that. We can clearly see in Wiegman that he did not stand like that. 

Now, you best remember what I said about keeping that image small.