Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I cleaned up the blog this evening, removing all the "Op" comments. And there won't be any more. I've taken care of that. 

Hey, Blase'! Here's an idea: Why don't you get yourself a girlfriend? Find a better way to use up all your free time, since you apparently have a lot of it. It's just a thought.

But, there was a real gem that came through from all this. Feast your eyes on this: 

I wasn't really expecting this, but I can't say that I'm surprised. It just confirms something that I already strongly believed. 

Of course, Joseph Backes is no defender of Lee Harvey Oswald. When has he ever defended him? And, Joseph Backes colludes with known Oswald accusers all the time, including bpete. Joseph Backes knows that bpete places Oswald on the 6th floor "locking and loading" and firing rounds into Kennedy. Yet, Backes participates on bpete's blog in complete collusion with him and support of him. When has Backes ever said anything critical of bpete? Here is a recent comment Backes left there.

Why would a real Oswald-innocent CT aid and abet those who espouse Oswald as killer? I can't stress enough how polarized this situation is. There is a huge, uncrossable divide between Oswald accusers and Oswald defenders. And it doesn't matter if the Oswald accusers are lone-nutters or HSCA-types who say that Oswald did it but may have had help. There isn't a dime's worth of difference between them. 

But, Joseph Backes is SUPPOSEDLY an Oswald defender, someone who says that Oswald did not do it and was framed. So, why does he collaborate with people who say Oswald was guilty? 

I have to agree with Anonymous that Joseph Backes is a fake and phony, and he is really working for the other side.  That's the reason he gets along with and praises Gary Mack and Hank Sienzant. Backes told lone-nutter and paid operative Hank Sienzant (which is an alias) that he has his back. I couldn't believe it when he said that, that a professed CT would tell a known LN that he has his back. What the hell is going on here?

Backes is a fake! He is NOT an Oswald-innocent CT. And he doesn't even do a good job of pretending to be one.  

So thank you, Anonymous. I shall spread your revelation far and wide. Here it is again: