No, Backes, you failed again. Show me anyone else besides the Mother and Baby who get washed out to the same extent. The baby's cap is orange- deep orange. Why is it completely gone? Jackie's pill-box hat went from pink to off-white, but the form of it is still there.
Again, look at the Fedora Man. He got through the wash just fine. He's still as clear as a bell. And your excuse about him is lame, ignorant, and foolish.
The degree of washing out of the Mother and Baby is much greater than for anybody else, and there is no excuse for it.
You are an idiot for thinking that they faked a bus ride and cab ride but didn't alter any image. And let's be clear about what you maintain, Backes: you deny any and all photographic and film alteration in the JFK assassination. You won't even admit that the Zapruder film was altered even though Douglas Horne, Oliver Stone, and many, many others do.
But here's what I maintain:
1. The flicking hand is the only motion that we see. Yet, it involves two people- not one. And she is holding the baby with just one arm, which is not a very secure arrangement. There is an active dynamic between the two of them. The idea that there would be rigidity and stillness of that whole 2-person structure save for her flicking hand is ridiculous.
Here is a video of the Queen of England waving. Notice that it is not just a movement of her hand at her wrist. Her whole arm is in motion, and really her entire body is in motion.
That is normal. That is the way it's done. The flicking hand of the Towner Woman looks mechanical and phony.
2. The Woman and Baby appear to be alone, yet, it is very unlikely that a woman would attend such an event alone with a baby that young without assistance.
3. She would never hold that baby with just one arm for 6 seconds or longer, considering the danger of dropping it.
4. We don't see how she is holding the baby at all. Do you see that halo on top of her head? That is actually her flicking hand.
5. Even though it looks like her left arm is coming across to support the baby in front, that is not true. And we know that because throughout the film, her left arm is raised and waving at the President. That light-colored "halo" is her flicking hand.
Don't argue with me about this because she is waving constantly. Here's the whole thing.
Is her left hand not ever waving? It is. It is waving throughout. Therefore, her left arm is never supporting the baby. So, when we look at this picture again, and putting aside the false appearance of her left arm supporting the baby in front, how exactly is she supporting the baby?
So, we are agreed that that is not her left arm coming across in front to support the baby, though it appears to be. Her left arm is waving overhead.
So, how is she supporting that baby? Wouldn't her right arm have to be coming around to where we could see it? How could her right arm be completely out of view but still provide support for the baby? Don't you have to get your arm around the baby to support it?
6. Why does the mother have a complete and total absence of facial features? On others, we don't see much, but we do see eyes.
It's not much, but it's something. At least we are seeing marks for their eyes. Why don't we such marks on the face of the Towner woman?
I also watched the film and did a screen save. This is what I got:
It is DEFINITELY her left hand above waving; nobody can deny that. Yet, it also looks like her left arm going across supporting the child. How can someone have two left arms? And let's consider how it's supposed to look when the left arm is up and waving:
So, why doesn't it look like that? Why don't we actually see her whole left arm going up? Why is it reduced to just a flicking hand? What happened to the visibility of her left arm? Why isn't it visible?
You have to admit that in this last image, it really does look like her arm is down and that we are seeing her shoulder. Who would look at that and think that it's a woman with her left arm raised high in the air?
Look, it doesn't work. It doesn't compute. This is a bogus image with so many contradictions, within itself, within the movie, and in comparison to the Altgens woman and 3 year old boy.
Nothing about this image works. Nothing. It is a screaming fraud. It's time to stop the insanity. She and the baby are not real.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.