Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, you're saying that we're not entitled to compare the Towner Mother and Baby to any photo. 

Well, fuck you, Backes, because yes, we can. And if we can't, then why look at it at all? Obviously, if you look at it, you're seeing something. Something is registering in your mind. You're getting information. And you can compare that information to the information you get from another photograph. 

You're just a rotten brat, Backes. You can't respond to the points I make, so you condemn the whole idea of examining the photo. 

The Towner woman has her left hand above her head waving. We know that from the film. And we're left with no indication of how she is supporting that baby because we can't see her right hand either. So, it's a problem, Backes. But, you being an apologist and a lap-dog for every film and photograph from the JFK assassination, excuse everything. 

Backes, photographic alteration existed long before the JFK assassination. It was widespread during the Civil War. You acknowledge that the JFK assassination was a state crime in which Oswald was framed and innocent. You even think they framed him for riding a bus and cab. Well, they surely were going to alter images to make sure that the photographic record supported the story they were telling. You are naive and stupid not to recognize that.