Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This woman was not Oswald's biological mother, and she was not Marguerite Claverie Oswald. 

Marguerite Claverie Oswald would have been 35 years old at the time this picture was taken. Isn't it obvious that this woman was older than 35?

And listen up, you lying scum: You know very well that this isn't a Ralph Cinque idea; it is a John Armstrong idea. I support him, but it is his discovery and his work and his passion, and there are many people that support him. His book, Harvey and Lee, sells for hundreds of dollars, even used. John Armstrong is one of the greatest JFK researchers of all time. 

And Mark Lane can't be faulted for not recognizing the falseness of the Marguerite impostor. Nobody did at the time, so why should it be expected of him? The frank truth is that it is beyond the mental envelope of just about everyone to venture into this realm. And that's what makes John Armstrong such a genius. But, you're just being a childish brat to suggest that Mark Lane was part of some conspiracy to foist a phony Marguerite Oswald on the world. It was her and Robert Oswald who did that, not Mark Lane. Mark Lane was their victim, as we all were.