Lovely, Ralph. So now David Wolper is part of the evil plot too. Is that
it? Or did J. Edgar Hoover ORDER David L. Wolper to utilize the multiple
clips of Oswald in the movie?
Talk about making mountains from molehills. Cinque can't "go anywhere"
with this latest rant of his. And he knows he can't go anywhere with it.
Because the stringing together of various clips showing Oswald at the
police station is totally innocuous editing on the part of Wolper's
filmmakers. IOW--it means nothing.
I can't even figure out why a person like Cinque would think such editing
"means" anything at all.
~big ol' shrug~
Ralph Cinque:
Of course, YOU would shrug it off, Peinhead. But then again you don't find fault with them for anything, do you. And when I say "them" I mean all of them: the ones who committed the murders, the ones who covered it up, the ones who made the propaganda films about it- all of them.
What was so terrible about the footage in which Oswald was being led through the building that they couldn't use it the way it was? Why did they have to weave other footages into it and string them together? Why would it even occur to them to do such a thing? It's tampering. It's way too shrewd and cunning. It's downright Machiavellian.
And yes, David Wolper was part of the plot, and so was Peter Jennings. But, they participated on a different level. There was a veil between them and the first level conspirators- who consciously, knowingly, and with wanton cruelty killed Kennedy. But, as soon as Kennedy was dead, then the power of officialdom took over. And that's the power that controlled people like Wolper and Jennings.
They were media guys. High level media guys. And thus they were connected to and integrated with the whole power structure of this country, where media and government are highly connected. Sprinkle on some good old patriotism to grease the wheels, and that's how you get guys like Wolper and Jennings to make these awful movies.
Did Wolper know that Lovelady was never in that squad room? Probably not. Wolper wasn't working at that level. Wolper only worked with what they gave him, and being a loyal American, he didn't question the legitimacy of what they gave him. A lifetime of brainwashing caused him not to question anything. As soon as Kennedy was dead, the mantra of "a crazed lone gunman did it" became the rallying cry for national recovery. Anyone who supported that, through film or song or books or whatever, was being heroic. He was helping America, shining a light at the end of the tunnel. I'm sure Wolper thought he was contributing to the healing of America.
Did Peter Jennings know that in his film, Beyond Conspiracy, they used a false, pasted on image of Marguerite with her 3 sons? The short dumpy Marguerite that we know was NOT the mother of those three boys. She wasn't even the biological mother of the Lee Harvey Oswald we know. They replaced the real Marguerite with the familiar one.
Did Peter Jennings know they did that? It's highly unlikely. There was no need to tell him. His job was to make it easier for Americans to accept what had happened and not be rattled by conspiracy theories. He knew what was expected of him, and that was not to question anything.
Instantly on the afternoon of 11/22/63, the official story of the JFK assassination became not just the law of the land, but accepting it became a litmus test for patriotism, and not just patriotism, but for decency, morality, and goodness.
I'll add "faith" to the list too. Faith in God, faith in country, faith in a bright future- all of that depended on accepting the official story of the JFK assassination, and it still does.
If it was totally innocuous editing, Peinhead, why didn't you mention it yourself? Why did you wait for me to bring it up? And if you didn't notice it until I brought it up, then my point is made. Four Days in November has been around since 1964, so 50 years. Half a century. How come nobody acknowledged this innocuous editing before?
The editing wasn't innocent; it was not innocuous; and most important, it wasn't honest. And you know that.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.