Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Let's continue with out examination of MO photos. Find that mole!

 Real or impostor? Let's hone in.

I'd say there is definitely a mole there- unless you think an artifact just happened to occur at that spot. So, this is the Marguerite impostor. 

And notice that she's wearing a nurse's uniform. And why not? She was a private duty nurse. But, this picture tells us something: the Marguerite impostor was always short, but she wasn't always fat. 

Here's another thing: she had thick hair with a lot of body. The real Marguerite didn't. Her hair was thin- even when she was young.

In the top right picture, you can't see much of her hair because of the hat, but if she had big thick hair, could she she be wearing that hat? Could she get it all in there?

So, the really thick, full-bodied hair goes with the MO impostor not the real one.

These two are both definitely the impostor, but the date on the right can't be right. The date on the left is (1942) and that's because the larger picture includes 3 year old LHO. He has his back to us, but he looks about 3.

It's from Beyond Conspiracy, the 2003 ABC Program hosted by Peter Jennings. So, that's 1942, but how could the other be 1943?

She is obviously younger on the right, so it had to be before 1942. So, why would they say 1943? It's because of the age difference between the real Marguerite and the impostor. The impostor was older. She was born in the 19th century. In 1943, the real MO was 36 years old. That woman looks about 36, but the year was probably about 1936. They had to fudge with the dates in order to accomplish the ruse. Those two are both the LHO impostor for sure.