Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

There is a reason why these must be the same shirt, and it concerns the way it is behaving. 

The most glaring, visible, in-your-face evidence that Doorman was Oswald is the behavior of that shirt. Supposedly, it was just a regular, ordinary shirt. Here it is from the Newseum, and it certainly looks like a regular, ordinary shirt.

But, is that Oswald's shrt? That shirt is being worn by a manikin, and it is completely unbuttoned. But, you can see the two buttons at the bottom, and it's easy enough to imagine how it would look if they were secured. It would look about the same as it does above except that the bottom would be cinched together. I'll demonstrate.

Why should it gape open? There's no reason. A subtle separation is all you get. Compare it to the others. 

Big difference, right? So, why the gape on Oswald and Doorman? Two reasons: First, Oswald was thin, and he had lost weight. He was 5'9" 131 pounds, which was 9 pounds less than he weighed just 3 months before in New Orleans when the police weighed him. When a shirt is too big for you, it tends to gape. 

But, that isn't the primary reason either. The primary reason for the gape has to do with the nature of Oswald's shirt. It had a soft collar and soft placket. The placket is the vertical strip of material going down the inside margin, and usually it is hard, as you can see it is on my shirt. And because it is hard, it doesn't bend over very easily. It remains flat against the chest, even when it's unbuttoned. But, Oswald's shirt was probably of Russian origin, and it had a soft collar and soft placket which folded over very easily. And that is what made it fold over, creating the gape. American shirts don't do that because they have hard collars and hard plackets. 

When you look at the Newseum shirt, you can see that it has a hard collar and hard placket. 

And, you know from numerous images that Oswald's shirt wasn't like that. You know that that shirt (above) could not and would not fold over like Oswald's did. In fact, that shirt is being worn by somebody, a manikin, and it is NOT folding over. Oswald's shirt never looked like that. You can see how stiff and hard that collar is, as well as the placket. That shirt is not doing what Oswald's did, and there is no way that it could. There is no way that it is the same shirt. It is NOT Oswald's shirt. They are lying to us about that. This is the third in a series of showings of Oswald's shirt in which they have never looked the same. 

But now, let's look at another demonstration of how an unbuttoned shirt behaves. And it is Billy Lovelady.

Notice here that the right side of his shirt (on our left) looks flush with his chest, with no gape. But the left side (on our right) has fallen, as if gravity existed on that side of the shirt but not the other side. So, what happened? I think what happened is that the FBI agent (or somebody) nudged the shirt over at the point where I placed the arrow. It was a deliberate attempt to create a gape where none existed. Why would the two sides of the shirt behave so differently? This was just a sorry and pathetic attempt to duplicate the look of Doorman with a very different shirt. 

That is the shirt Lovelady said he wore on 11/22, which is precisely why they photographed him wearing it unbuttoned like Doorman. 
Notice it has short sleeves, like this shirt:

And of course, we know that Lovelady drew an arrow to that figure to point to himself. 

The bottom line is that Oswald's shirt was VERY UNIQUE, and it was most definitely FOREIGN. There is no way that Lovelady's shirt behaved like Oswald's shirt, and there is no way that it could have. Only Oswald was decked out like this.