Friday, September 19, 2014

There is a guy who blogs profusely on McAdams' forum, shamelessly flaunting a new alias every few days or so. But, it doesn't matter because I have no trouble recognizing him. And for all I know, it could be McAdams himself. It wouldn't surprise me. And regardless, McAdams is his enabler; so I hold McAdams responsible. 

But lately, he's been going by Tom Rossley, who is his antithesis, being an Oswald defender. 

I pointed out that this is supposed to be an image of Lee Harvey Oswald. It is part of the official record of the HSCA. Yet, it is obviously not Oswald, nor is it the only image of Oswald that is obviously not him. Isn't it obvious that he isn't Oswald?





This blogger, whom I call Bozo the Clown or just "Boz" for short, actually said that the man above is Gerald Ford. 



I asked John Armstrong to comment, and here is what he said:

"No, Ralph, that isn't Gerald Ford. Grab my book, check the footnotes, and you will see the source of this photo. This person identified himself as Lee Harvey Oswald when the photo was taken. That image was given to the HSCA and became part of the official record of the HSCA- as an image of Oswald."

It is supposedly from when Oswald went to the Cuban consulate in September 1963. Here is another image of Oswald reportedly taken at the Cuban embassy on the same day.  



This other image of Oswald (below) was reportedly taken at the Russian consulate also on the same day in September 1963.


The above image of Lee Harvey Oswald was provided to the FBI by the CIA on November 23, 1963. 

It's obvious that none of these images are of Oswald. Why the bogus images? It's because bogus images are what the whole case against Oswald is based on.  Guys like John McAdams and Bozo the Clown are swimming in blood and bogus images. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.