Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I have been saying for what seems like millennia that there is no way they were going to claim that Doorman was Lovelady without doing something to Lovelady-ify him. And what they did was move over the top of his head, including his hairline. And it was a clever thing to do because we look at people from the top down. We don't look at them from the bottom up; it's a top-down process. So, if the first impression you get of him is Lovelady, it may stick. But, it shouldn't stick because everything else about Doorman is Oswald including his clothes. How could anyone but Oswald be wearing Oswald's clothes? This collage gives you some idea of the transformation that was made. It shows how Doorman must have looked before they messed with him and then the final result. It is the opposite of the Backyard photos. There, they moved Oswald's face over to the body of another man except that they left the other man's chin. Here, they just moved over Lovelady's "cap". But note that they were working off a photo of Lovelady from the 1950s when he had more hair than he had in 1963.

Now, here's the photo they worked off. Based on his apparent age, I date it to 1957. Lovelady was born in 1937, and here he looks about 20, hence 1957. So that would have been a 6 year spread. But, notice how identical their hair is.

What if we compared your current picture to one of you from 6 years ago? Would your hair look exactly the same in terms of length, style, cut, lay, and also the shape of your hairline and amount of recession? And remember that Lovelady was a rapidly balding young man. Those hairlines are identical because they are the same hairline. This may well be the junction line below.