Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backass is putting up links to bpete's site on his page. Backes, who claims to believe that Oswald was in the building, although he hasn't the foggiest notion where except not on the 6th floor, is more than willing to promote someone who proclaims that Oswald was up on the 6th floor shooting at Kennedy.

Think about that from a values standpoint. How could any genuine advocate of Oswald's innocence align himself with and extol someone who advocates Oswald's guilt? 

It's really quite insane when you think about it. This is a war. It may be even more divided than a war is. During World War I, there was actually a Christmas truce right at the trenches, where the fighting men from the two sides got together and exchanged gifts, enjoyed what food and libations they had, played music, sang songs, and made merry. The next day, they were back to killing each other. You can read about it here.  

http://history1900s.about.com/od/1910s/a/christmastruce.htm

I don't mind a bit that it happened in that case. After all, World War I was just an insane power struggle among tyrants, for whom the soldiers on both sides were just pawns; they had no vested interest whatsoever. And isn't that usually the case in war?

But, the war we're in is very black and white. This is like the Sharks and the Jets, the Montagues and the Capulets, the Hatfields and McCoys. There shouldn't be any fraternizing with the enemy. But, Joseph Backes bends over and grabs his ankles for the enemy. 

Backes has spoken highly of Gary Mack- repeatedly. He's the guy who runs that lie-mill called the Sixth Floor Museum. Backes has praised Hank Sienzant, a rabid lone-nutter and relentless forum dweller, who has lied about his identity, claiming to be the Vice President of Customer Relations at a software company that caters to video game merchants until I caught him in his lie and exposed him. His response was to tell another lie; he denied that he ever made the former claim. But, it was on his Education Forum profile! And yet, Joseph Backes, a professed CT, has told Hank Sienzant "I've got your back." 

And now Backes is getting all giddy about his new hero bpete, putting up links to his website and fawning over him. 

Backes: bpete doesn't place Oswald in the doorway; he places him up on the 6th floor shooting at Kennedy. That should bother you a lot more.

Now Backes is making a stink because Whaley didn't go to the police on Friday. He waited til Saturday. Is Backes out of his mind? I'm sure many people would not have gone to the police at all. What, you think everyone wants to get involved in this kind of thing? And Whaley didn't go to the police at all. He went to his supervisor. It was his supervisor's decision to advise the police to talk to Whaley. It isn't anything to get troubled over. Go play with your proscenium arches, Backes. You're getting worked up over nothing.

The point is that the idea that Whaley drove Oswald started with Whaley. He went to his supervisor with it. That supervisor passed it on to police. So, how could police "manipulate" Whaley about something which he reported to his supervisor before police knew a thing about it or him? 

The whole concept that Whaley drove Oswald to N. Beckley originated with Whaley not the police. 

Was Whaley lying when he approached his supervisor about it? Who was pressuring him to lie then? 

Nobody, you dumb pluck. Yet, somehow you turn it around that police got Whaley to lie. Idiot.

The public transportation story is NOT fiction. 

And leave it to the Idiot Backes to challenge it without having any idea what the alternative might be. Was the Roger Craig story true? Backes doesn't know. All Backes claims to know that is that Oswald definitely didn't walk from the Texas School Book Depository to the Texas Theater. And that's because: "the distance and time factors can only be solved by a car." LOL. A goofy way to put it, Backass, but thanks for letting us know.