Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, bpete MacSparrow thinks all that number crunching is a good thing. It reminds me of the old show What's My Line. Was it Man #2? Was it Man #3? Will the real Lee Harvey Oswald please step forward. 

Forget, Sparrah Boy. I told you all that bickering about numbers meant nothing, and I meant it. And I won't even dignify by delving into it any further. 

And look how duplicitous bpete is. He's made it clear that he thinks Oswald was guilty, that he was up on the 6th floor blasting away at Kennedy. 

So, why would the Dallas Police want to concoct a phony story about his transportation? And why would the Warren Commission- the same group which, according to Sparrowhead, made an honest and sincere investigation of the Doorman issue? Why'd they go bad and turn to the dark side on this little thing about how Oswald got home? If Oswald did it, didn't they have him dead to rights? Why did they have to make ANYTHING up?

bpete also thinks they went dirty when they claimed that Oswald didn't change his shirt. Or, does he think they just made an honest mistake about that?

Well regardless, bpete definitely doesn't think they made a mistake about Whaley. He thinks they put Whaley up to it. It was a dastardly plot to misconstrue what really happened. The Dallas Police were in on it; the FBI must have had a hand in it; and even the Warren Commission played its part. 

You know, you give up a lot when you attribute such things to these people, Sparrow-brains. You're admitting they were bad guys and that the whole investigation was corrupt. Therefore, why should we believe the part concerning Doorman? Maybe they did to Frazier and Arce whatever you think they did to Whaley?  

John Armstrong made a very good point, which was: it would be a lot to say that they "manipulated" one person to lie, to tell a story that was untrue, and not just a little untrue but completely untrue. But, according to bpete and others, it wasn't just one person. It was Whaley. It was McWatters. It was Bledsoe. It was Roberts. It was a lie-fest. Everybody was made to lie.  

What possible reason did William Whaley have to lie? What was in it for him? What did they threaten him with to make him do it? 

Watch this and tell me if Whaley looks and sounds like a man living under the duress of an evil secret and carrying a monstrous burden of guilt and fear.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3G8FZ92vjs


He wasn't an actor, and he wasn't a secret agent. He was a cab driver. What possible motive could he have to lie? What possible threat could they have made to coerce him to lie? 

Like a sparrow that can fly from one tree to another, bpete darts back and forth between LN arguments and CT arguments in a breathtaking display of inconsistency and contradiction. The only thing that is sincere about him is that he is sincerely a blood-soaked Kennedy-killer without a feather of honesty or integrity.