Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

How could bpete think that authorities got it right that Lee Harvey Oswald was up on the 6th floor pumping bullets into Kennedy, blowing his brains out, BUT, at the same time, they also felt the need to frame him for the way he left Dealey Plaza by producing phony witnesses such as William Whaley?

And if Whaley was phony, then surely McWatters and Bledsoe also had to be phony, which means that authorities did conspire to lay down a devious, cunning, and Machiavellian plot against Oswald- one that was definitely criminal and would have made Machiavelli proud- all when Oswald was supposedly the guilty one. 

Such a plot, with multiple phony witnesses, would have been extensive and certainly more than any one person could do, therefore, bpete is indeed admitting to a vast web of corruption and conspiracy within the Dallas Police department and within the FBI and Secret Service as well- since they were also involved in the investigation. 

Then, it was all reinforced by the Warren Commision, and bpete has accused Warren Commission lawyer David Belin of wrongdoing and corruption in the handling of William Whaley's testimony. bpete has also accused the WC of wrongdoing and corruption in regard to the issue of Oswald's shirt, which bpete says Oswald most definitely DID change, which means that authorities engaged in a major criminal framing of Oswald over that.    

We have all heard of framing an innocent man but, in this case, bpete thinks authorities criminally framed a guilty man. 

In fact, bpete is accusing authorities of very serious crime and corruption, and of conspiring to commit such crimes, yet, in other areas, such as the identity of the Doorman Man, bpete dismisses any possibility of similar crime and corruption by these very same authorities.        

How can such a double standard apply, and how can such a polar-opposite and utterly contradictory view of, and attitude towards, authorities be assumed by one person? 

It's because this one person, bpete, doesn't think about his contradictions. 

I am reminded of Fred Astaire who in the movie Swing Time sang, "My two feet haven't met yet". Likewise, the two sides of bpete's brain haven't met yet- the side that says authorities honestly investigated the case and pursued justice, and the side that says they engaged in criminal wrongdoing- as he clumsily lays out his whacked and contradictory analysis of the case, swapping hats back and forth as needed depending on his current preoccupation.   

Ultimately, I attribute it to a tremendous amount of immaturity. 

I've said all along that bpete is NOT a man; he is a boy; a boy who likes loud music- the louder the better; a boy who likes to draw childish pictures of other men; a boy who likes to make lewd remarks about woman, trying to prove his manhood. He hasn't matured a bit since 1985 when he was a raucous rock n roller. Maybe all that raucous music damaged his brain.