Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

There is no one on Earth who is more full of shit than me, says Joseph Backes. 

But, how can a CT who professes to believe that Oswald was innocent say that? Wouldn't John McAdams have to be more full of shit than I am for saying that Oswald was up on the 6th floor shooting at Kennedy? And likewise for Vincent Bugliosi, Gerald Posner, David Von Pein, Max Holland, and numerous others? 

And even when you consider it geographically, meaning distance-wise, it's ridiculous. Backes doesn't profess to know where Oswald was at the time of the murder except that he was in the building and nowhere near the 6th floor. Well, the place I'm stipulating was very close to the inside of the building- just a few feet outside it. And in distance, my place is much closer to any hypothetical place Backes has in mind than the 6th floor. 

So, what determines the amount of shit? What's shittier, saying that Oswald was high-up shooting at Kennedy, blowing his brains out OR saying that he was down-low and not harming anyone? In essence, EVERY CT, except the HSCA kind (who are not truly CTs; they are really just LNs with a coat of veneer), says that Oswald was down-low and not harming anyone. So, in magnitude what's worse? 

Wouldn't anyone with a sincere conviction about Oswald innocence find the positions of Bugliosi, Von Pein, Posner, and McAdams much shittier than my position? 

Joseph Backes does not have a sincere bone in his body. He is NOT an Oswald defender, and he has never once said a word in defense of Lee Harvey Oswald. And, his friendliness to and praise of numerous LNs makes him the most duplicitous, deceitful, and dastardly fake CT there ever was. 

And that leads me to say that there is no one in the community of fake CTs who is more full of shit and more full of evil than Joseph Backes.