Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Joseph Backes: "I never said Bledsoe was part of any conspiracy to kill JFK, nor part of any grand conspiracy to cover it up."

Ralph Cinque: I didn't accuse you of saying she was part of the conspiracy to KILL JFK. I accused you of implying she was part of the cover-up. 

You said: they MANIPULATED her into MAKING STATEMENTS THAT WERE UNTRUE.

How the hell did they do that? What does the hell does it mean? 

How do you "manipulate" someone to make untrue statements - in fact, to tell a totally fabricated, fictitious tale- without making him or her aware that you are up to no-good?  

How can it be done without bringing the person into the conspiracy? Not the conspiracy to kill but the conspiracy to misrepresent what happened? 

Why would Mrs. Bledsoe join such a thing? And I mean under any circumstances. 

You can't just say they "manipulated" her. What the fuck? That communicates nothing. That has no substantive value, no content. By itself, it is meaningless; it's just noise. 

I am asking you to express- concretely- what the hell you are talking about, but you, Backes, refuse to do it. And it's because you're a fucking moron who is drenched in the blood of John F. Kennedy. You DON'T give a shit about Kennedy. You certainly don't give a shit about Oswald. And you don't give a shit about the truth either because if you did, you would try to clarify; you would try to elucidate. But, you don't. 

Instead, you just make a meaningless general statement: "They manipulated her into telling a completely false story" but without explaining HOW. 

How did they manipulate her, Backes?
How did they manipulate her, Backes?
How did they manipulate her, Backes?