Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

bpete asks how I can assume they made footage of Oswald in the late 60s if he was killed in 1963. But, the footage of Oswald was real. The footage of everybody was real except for Lovelady being there. I'm saying that below is how it looked when it was actually taken:

It was all there except that there was nobody at that desk. It's not even the kind of desk at which anyone would be seated. It was really just a supply table where documents were stored. Look how narrow it is. It is not a place where anyone would sit. It was right in the lane of traffic. There is a door there which had to be accessed. Anyone, including these guys, who wanted to reach that back office had to walk by that desk, right through the spot where Lovelady was supposedly sitting. Since you can still see the silhouette of him, ask yourself how that big cop barreled through Lovelady. And remember that Lovelady's legs and feet would have been sticking out farther than we can see. 

Did the big cop hop over Lovelady? But, Lovelady would have seen the procession coming and approaching, and he would have gotten himself out of the way. Nobody is going to just sit there and inconvenience a whole long procession of cops. It's not like he was paralyzed or crippled. You get the hell out of the way when you're in the way. You don't just sit there like a lump on a log.   

Now watch the gif again, and this time notice that nobody is reacting to Lovelady. Nobody is making eye contact with him. Nobody is looking at him. It's like he wasn't there. He wasn't!

 Notice that you never see anybody looking at Lovelady. How would it be any different if he wasn't there? It wouldn't. You have to realize that based on him being in their visual field alone, they would react to him on a reflex level: a head snap, an eye glance, and momentary fix. That's what we do; we fix on things in our visual field if only for a moment. These cops are all acting like Lovelady wasn't there. He wasn't. He was added to the film. It was a video/video merger. It is something that is extremely easy to do today digitally but was still possible to do then. It was possible as early as 1945. 

http://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video;_ylt=A0oG7ls_VshSZWUA3BtXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTB0Ym9ydHE0BHNlYwNzYwRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkA1ZJUDM2NF8x?p=Gene+Kelly+dancing+with+Jerry+Mouse 

In this case, Lovelady corresponds to the cartoon figure. They took real footage from the day of the assassination and implanted the video of Lovelady into it, just like Jerry Mouse got implanted into the video with Gene Kelly. 

And the point was that the clock said a little after 2 in both versions of the walk-by footage: the one where the big cop and Oswald move to the door to interact with Fritz and the one in which they don't. 

On the right, it's the same time, but the big cop and Oswald are not over by the door, and there is no door. 

In this version of the footage, the big cop and Oswald NEVER turn right. They never make that sweep over to the door. And again, we don't actually see a door here. If there is a door there, shouldn't we see the top of it? The margin between the top of the door and the wall? The door doesn't go up to the ceiling. There should be a color contrast, a gap. 

And I do own the DVD Three Shots that Changed America from the History Channel, but I have no way to take a gif from it. So, I found it online and am using it. Do you ask permission when you take images from me to draw your childish pictures? 

They deliberately went back and slimmed that guy down. They realized afterwards that it was a mistake to use someone so thick and muscular. There isn't more than one guy in a hundred who is built like that. Lovelady wasn't, and the idea that that guy could ever have been mistaken for Oswald is preposterous. 

Like Lovelady's wife and kids were ever going to mistake Oswald on television for their husband and father. Fat chance. So they had to slim Hercules down:

That is obviously an altered image on the left. How could they both be legit? And it is obvious that the one on the left is the one messed with. 

And again, if you admit that Oswald was framed and innocent, as Joseph Backes and Clark Rob do, why would you defend this? Why would you dismiss it? Why would you shrug your shoulders at it? 

They faked these movies, and that is screaming out loud.