Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Doug Horne has become a very strong advocate of Zapruder film alteration. Without criticism, Joseph Backes posted on Doug Horne's advocacy of Zapruder film alteration:

http://justiceforkennedy.blogspot.com/2012/05/update-from-doug-horne-on-zapruder-film.html?zx=bd53272866d9749a 

Here is Doug's write-up about Zapruder film alteration on Lewrockwell.com: 

http://archive.lewrockwell.com/orig13/horne-d1.1.1.html

Doug Horne is also an advocate of Nix and Muchmore film alteration.  He is also an advocate of, and what he is most famous for, is championing alteration of the medical evidence, including the medial imagery in the JFK case.

1. I know, from my former role as a government official on the staff of the ARRB (from 1995-1998), that there is overwhelming evidence of a government-directed medical cover-up in the death of JFK, and of wholesale destruction of autopsy photographs, autopsy x-rays, early versions of the autopsy report, and biological materials associated with the autopsy. Furthermore, dishonest autopsy photographs were created; skull x-rays were altered; the contents of the autopsy report changed over time as different versions were produced; and the brain photographs in the National Archives cannot be photographs of President Kennedy's brain -- they are fraudulent, substitute images of someone else's brain.
   

   When you advocate that much photo and film alteration, it raises the question whether all the films which passed through government hands weren't altered. All of the images below are claimed to be Billy Lovelady on 11/22/63. 
   

   

   It is very apparent that they are three different men. The one in the middle is definitely Lovelady, photographed by the FBI on February 29, 1964 in Dallas. He was posing as Doorway Man, wearing the same clothes he wore on 11/22/63, which they stated in plain English.

What part of "He stated he was wearing a red and white vertical striped shirt and blue jeans" do you not understand? 

But, the most important thing is that it is very obvious-visually- that these three men are different men. 

It's very obvious that the man on the left is considerably older than the man in the middle, with different hair, different build, different everything. And the man on the right has a massive muscular arm that is sharply different from the other two. Likewise, his hair is starkly different from the real Lovelady in the middle. They are three different men. If we were talking about anything else but the JFK assassination, nobody in his right mind would try to claim that they were the same man, that any two of them were the same man. And it means, without a doubt, that phony films were made. 

Backes, there was no duplication of the exact likeness of Lovelady. It is not anything close to the exact likeness of Lovelady. And that is the problem. Look at it again, Backes. They are different men with different features, different builds, different faces, different everything. Denying it just makes you look stupid. If you can't even admit that they look different, then you don't have an honest bone in your body. They are different men. Different men. But, they are all claimed to be Lovelady. But, it can't be. Reality says it can't be.