Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Douglas Horne of the ARRB is a staunch advocate that the Zapruder film was altered. He also advocates that the Nix and Muchmore films were altered to hide Secret Service complicity. He further stipulates massive alteration of the medical evidence, including the images of Kennedy's body. 

That's a lot of image tampering to endorse, and anyone who endorses that much image tampering has got to be open to the possibility that all of the films were altered. It is beyond doubt that all of the motorcade films wound up in government hands, including Zapruder, Wiegman, Martin, Hughes, Nix and Muchmore. In some cases, they were bought by private media organizations, like Life magazine, and then "lent" to the FBI for a period of time.

Here are many images of Lovelady from 11/22/63, and to compare, I included the 2/29/64 image of Lovelady taken by the FBI. That was really him. I don't say they didn't tamper with it because I'm sure they did. But, at least they started with him. 

But, does any other claimed image of him from 11/22/63 match the FBI photo? Do any of the other images match each other? Isn't this just a hodge-podge of disparate images that cannot possibly be the same man? Doesn't it prove that the FBI went into the movie business and concocted phony images of Lovelady wearing a plaid shirt on 11/22/63? They had already put it in writing TWICE that Lovelady claimed to have worn a short-sleeved striped shirt, and they even posed him in the shirt and had him unbutton it like Doorman. Why would they do that unless it were the same shirt? It is very obvious that at the time they were representing that short-sleeved striped shirt as the one Lovelady wore. The incompatibility with Doorman's shirt simply sailed over their heads at the time. And they realized afterwards that damage control required more than just a statement reversal; they had to produce images of him wearing the other shirt they were now claiming. And that is how the phony movie-making got launched. It was all about showcasing Lovelady wearing a plaid shirt, which he did not wear on 11/22/63. It was all a big lie, a fabrication. 

This collage speaks for itself. It shows multiple fake Loveladys, and there is no doubt about it. Unless you are blind, you can see it. And the conclusion that that leads to is inescapable: the FBI made phony movies of Lovelady to sell him in a plaid shirt; the FBI made phony movies of Lovelady to sell him in a plaid shirt; the FBI made phony movies of Lovelady to sell him in a plaid shirt.