Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

When you know that the entire story of the JFK assassination as reported by the media was a lie, when you know that they were complicit in demonizing Oswald and serving the needs and interests of the killers, why would you believe anything they say about 11/22/63? 

Whatever was broadcast on 11/22/63 existed as a film which could be altered. Was there anything stopping them from altering it? Is there any reason to think they would not alter it if altering it would bolster the official story? Is it possible that they could show us something today, claim it was unaltered from 11/22/63, but actually have altered it? YES!  Of course, they could. 

WFAA then and now has always supported the official story of the assassination, that Oswald, alone, and without telling anyone, assassinated JFK. The evidence is overwhelming that that did not happen, yet they said it and are still saying it. So, why would you believe anything claimed by such an organization? Why would you believe anything they said? Why would you give them the benefit of the doubt about anything?  

This is a gif of WFAA's clip of the Lovelady walk-by from A Year Ago Today. 

Notice how blurred it is, though not all frames are blurred. But, some of them are. Here is a comparison of two frames:

Do you notice how much sharper it is on the right? On the left, you have DeNiro Lovelady who was deliberately slimmed down and blurred. They blurred him so that he would blend with the other Lovelady OK.

Notice how fast the gif is. The camera only shows DeNiro for a small fraction of a second? Do you think the cameraman shot it that way? Of course not. They sped it up because they didn't want you to recognize the differences between the two Lovladys. 

Notice how dark the gif is starting out. It has very strange lighting, where men in procession are enveloped in darkness. Why did it start like that and then brighten up if it was all one film? 

This is a bait and switch in which you get exactly one split-second look at DeNiro Lovelady and then the big linebacker cop gets in the way, and when he steps aside, the other version begins with Embedded Lovelady. 

This is two separate and distinct movies that were spliced together. WFAA did that, but they certainly didn't do it on 11/22/63 or 11/22/64. It was done much later, and probably quite recently, meaning in the last few 5 years. So, 45 years after the JFK assassination, they were still messing with the movies, altering their content, and lying about what they contained. 

After proffering this, that we should accept anything WFAA says about what was shown on 11/22/63 is preposterous. This is clearly an altered, highly edited, and falsified film, and it is being offered by WFAA. They are into the lies and cover-up up to their necks. 

Backes, if you believe the Lee Harvey Oswald was framed and innocent, you don't believe anything WFAA said- then or now. 

This film is a laughing stock, the obvious merging of two disparate films that were sped up and blurred up in order to get it them to work together. But, it's only to the unobservant and brain-dead that it seems to work. When you examine it closely, you realize there are at least 2 Loveladys, and it may involve 3. 

It is an outrage that this is being represented as anything but a Nazi propaganda movie.