So, it was choice between "18 year old boys" or "18 year old men" and I was not going to go with men. I don't consider 18 year olds men. So, they can vote and join the Army; so what? They're not men. We send boys off to fight our wars; it's what we do.
But, this is a totally moot point because the images I picked were of 18 year olds. So, whether you call them "boys" or "men" doesn't matter. The only issue was their age.
It's tiny, but do you see that it says "by 18 year old British actor"?
The same is true of the other one.
There, it has the age 18 in there twice, and that's why I went with it. I was comparing Danny Arce, who claimed to be 18, to two boys who were, in fact, 18.
And you, Backes, are falling way behind. As I said, the top reason to suspect Danny Arce of complicity is the way Joseph Ball handled him. The fact that Joseph Ball had the nerve and the confidence to ask Danny Arce directly, pointedly, and straight as an arrow: "You see this guy? Who is he?" about Doorman and elicit a verbal answer means that it was pre-arranged. Ball KNEW what Arce was going to say.
You being a phony CT and all, I have to point out to you that Joseph Ball was determined to find for Oswald's guilt as lone gunman- at any cost. There were no other options he could tolerate. There was no way he could allow the investigation to go in any other direction.
But, it wasn't risky for Ball to ask Danny Arce OUT LOUD who Doorman was. That's because Ball was 100% sure of what Arce was going to say. And that is precisely why Joseph Ball didn't ask Lovelady in the same way. He didn't know what Lovelady was going to say, so he couldn't ask him directly. So, he played the game with the arrows. They didn't have any prior understanding.
What was at stake? Everything! Try to imagine the Warren Report with everything it contained, but with the addition of one person saying that it was Oswald in the doorway. That one addition would have completely nullified, destroyed, and eviscerated the Warren Report. It would have been the only thing that people talked about.
"Did you hear that so-and-so said that Oswald was standing in the doorway right during the shooting? You think it's true? This changes everything."
So, if any witness had blurted out that it was Oswald was in the doorway, it would have been stricken it from the record. But, there was no chance of Danny Arce doing that, so Joseph Ball cast caution to the wind. Joseph Ball KNEW what Danny Arce was going to say. And Joseph Ball TRUSTED Danny Arce- like a partner in crime.
But, besides that, we have the fact that Danny Arce claimed to be west of the Depository when we can see him east of the Depository.
Are you saying that those are two different men, Backes? That there just happened to be another guy in Dealey Plaza who looked like Danny Arce, same deep dark eyes, same hair, same shape face, and both wearing a dark coat? Is that what you're claiming?
Because it would have been a damn freaky thing if the two had run into each other.
So, since we can see Danny Arce east of the Depository, what does that make of this?
Mr. BALL. Where were you standing when you heard the shots?
Mr. ARCE. I was standing in front of the Texas School Book Depository. I was on that grassy area part in front.
Mr. BALL. You were not on the sidewalk?
Mr. ARCE. No, I was on the sidewalk, then I walked up to the grass to get a higher view. and still couldn't see.
Mr. BALL. Did you hear shots?
Mr. BALL. Did you hear shots?
Mr. ARCE. Yeah.
Mr. BALL. How many?
Mr. ARCE. Three.
Mr. BALL. When you were on the grass, were you south where you were? Where were you with reference to the entrance to the Texas School Book Depository?
Mr. ARCE. I was down to the west side, a little more to the west.
Mr. BALL. Were you west of the building itself?
Mr. Arce. Yeah.
Mr. BALL. You were not in front of the building?
Mr. ARCE. I was directly in front, but then I walked a few steps down to the west side.
Mr. BALL. Where were you with reference to the west wall of the building?
Mr. ARCE. Oh, I was way far from it. I was across the street, I mean.
Mr. BALL. What do you mean "across the street"?
Mr. ARCE. Well, there's a little sidewalk right across the street and there's some grass and things up there and that's where I was at. I couldn't tell you exactly where I was, see, it's hard to explain. I walked away from the other guys because they were all in front of the building. I crossed the street to get a closer view.
Mr. BALL. You walked which direction?
Mr. ARCE. I just--right across the street.
Mr. BALL. Right across Elm Street?
Mr. ARCE. Uh-huh.
Mr. BALL. The part of Elm that dead ends there?
Mr. ARCE. Yeah.
Mr. BALL. You crossed that and went on to the grassy part?
Mr. ARCE. Uh-huh.
Mr. ARCE. I was down to the west side, a little more to the west.
Mr. BALL. Were you west of the building itself?
Mr. BALL. You were not in front of the building?
Mr. ARCE. I was directly in front, but then I walked a few steps down to the west side.
Mr. BALL. Where were you with reference to the west wall of the building?
Mr. ARCE. Oh, I was way far from it. I was across the street, I mean.
Mr. BALL. What do you mean "across the street"?
Mr. ARCE. Well, there's a little sidewalk right across the street and there's some grass and things up there and that's where I was at. I couldn't tell you exactly where I was, see, it's hard to explain. I walked away from the other guys because they were all in front of the building. I crossed the street to get a closer view.
Mr. BALL. You walked which direction?
Mr. ARCE. I just--right across the street.
Mr. BALL. Right across Elm Street?
Mr. ARCE. Uh-huh.
Mr. BALL. The part of Elm that dead ends there?
Mr. ARCE. Yeah.
Mr. BALL. You crossed that and went on to the grassy part?
Mr. ARCE. Uh-huh.
It makes it bull shit is what it does, and it's no wonder Arce was so evasive and sputtering about it. He could barely get the words out.
So, putting aside the issue of Danny Arce designating himself as white, even though it is a legitimate thing to inquire about it, and no, it does not make me a racist, we have the following:
1) we have Danny Arce lying about his location in Dealey Plaza
2) we have Danny Arce appearing to hold a walkie-talkie in his hand during the shooting, and neither you nor anyone else as offered any other explanation for that object. If it's not a walkie-talkie, what is it?
4) we have the photos from No Name Key which many people before me linked to Danny Arce. And it involves 2 figures from the photograph matching 2 figures in Dealey Plaza.
And between the other two, you see the same eyes, the same nose, the same mouth, the same chin.
The matching eyes are downright haunting.
And what is the basis by which Joseph Backes denies it all? It's simply because Danny Arce declared his age to be 18 and said that he was in Dallas the whole time.
What about lying, Backes? You, who thinks that the Dallas Police concocted a whole bus ride and cab ride for Oswald and who thinks that the Warren Commission concocted whole swaths of testimony for Lovelady claiming to go down to the railroad tracks and re-enter through the back door refuse to consider the possibility that Danny Arce lied.
People lied in their testimonies, Backes. Will Fritz lied when he said that Oswald told him "he was eating lunch with other employees" during the shooting. There isn't anyone who believes that. Even Vincent Bugliosi admits that Oswald had his lunch before the assassination at a time that James "Junior" Jarman and "another short negro" Harold Norman were milling around the domino room. By the time of the shooting, those guys were perched up at the 5th floor window below the Sniper's Nest.
So, Fritz lied, Backes. And Arce lied too. He damn sure lied when he said that Doorman was Lovelady. He just kept saying it over and over again, "That's Billy Lovelady." "That's Billy Lovelady." "That's Billy Lovelady." He never qualified it. He never elaborated. He never said he knew it was Billy because of this, that, or the other thing. He just made a curt statement and repeated it.
The killing of John Kennedy was a conspiracy, Backes. It wasn't a small conspiracy; it was a big conspiracy. It involved a lot of people on a lot of different levels. William Westin showed us how the Texas School Book Depository was a CIA front company in which clandestine and illegal activities were done under the guise of distributing "Dick and Jane" books for little kids.
Agents worked there, Backass. You got it? And I'm saying that Bill Shelley was one of those agents. And so was Danny Arce.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.