Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

There is no difference between LNs and HSCA CTs. It's exactly the same as with agnostics and athiests. 

An agnostic says there is no evidence for the existence of God, so he doesn't believe, while an athiest says there is no God, so he doesn't believe. There's a difference there in epistemological justification, but there is no practical difference in how they live their lives- which is without regard for, or interest in, or consideration for "God".  

And it's same for LNs and HSCA CTs.  Both place the patsy Oswald on the 6th floor killing Kennedy and wounding Connally. There is no reason to regard them as anything but being in the same camp and on the same side.

But Joseph Backes doesn't claim to be a HSCA CT. He claims to be an Oswald-innocent CT (not that he EVER says anything in defense of Lee Harvey Oswald). 

But for someone who places Oswald away from the 6th floor and who even spoke RESPECTFULLY about those who place Oswald IN THE DOORWAY, it is incomprehensible that Joseph Backes would collude with those who place a rifle in Oswald's hands and have him locking and loading and pumping rounds into Kennedy from the 6th floor. 

But, he doesn't just collude with them. He promotes them. He links to them. He coddles them. He calls them "Sir". He told Hank Sienzant, a known LN operative, that he has his back. 

Of all the JFK blogs in the blogosphere, Backes only lists two that he follows: bpete, the original "lock and load" guy who has Oswald pumping rounds into Kennedy, and Robin Unger, who has never challenged or denied Oswald's guilt. 

Why would an Oswald-innocent CT align himself with Oswald-guilters? 

This is tantamount to an admission that Joseph Backes is a fake. He is a phony. Joseph Backes is NOT a defender of Lee Harvey Oswald. And he is not to be trusted by anyone with a sincere interest in JFK assassination truth. Joseph Backes is a wicked, evil, and vicious man. These horns are for real.

But alas, Joseph Backes is also a very stupid man. He thinks that one flippant remark in a personal letter written over 40 years ago is sufficient to establish the existence of another African-American on the sidewalk in front of the doorway. He lacks anything else to support this claim. Joseph Backes is willing to bet the farm on this:

Now, what would an intelligent person do who found this and got enthused? He would look for a way to corroborate it. He would start studying photos and films. He would look for references to it by other researchers. He would look to see if Richard E. Sprague referenced it elsewhere and provided objective evidence. 

But no, without doing any of that, Joseph Backes just hails it and declares it as fact. And, he takes out his crayons.

This projection of Backes is ridiculous. The proportion between the hand and the arm are all wrong. The way the hand is torqued is anatomically impossible without breaking something. He doesn't even have the wrist in the right place. And it's just plain stupid because he's got the skin and the shirt of the "other African-American" registering in the photo exactly the same.

So, Joseph Backes is both a devil and a dolt. Do not listen to him. Don't listen to a word he says. He's just a moron- a vicious, evil, nasty moron. And he shall go down only as a traitor to the cause of JFK truth.