Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backshit, for a long time we have had on the OIC website the short letter which was signed by the two FBI agents, but we do not have posted the longer letter which is unsigned. 

And yes, I had seen it before, it's true. But still, just the day before you had said that there was just one such letter. I told you there were two, and you said I meant one. But, I knew there were two, and that's why I said Eureka. 

They are two separate letters, Backass. They have different dates. One is signed and the other not. And even though there is overlapping content the placement of the content is scrambled between the two. For instance, the part about Lovelady having said that he wore a red and white vertical striped shirt and blue jeans occurs at the beginning of one letter and at the end of the other. 

It counts as another letter. It counts as a second time that the FBI put in writing that Lovelady said that he wore the striped shirt- the same one in which they photographed him on 2/29. You don't know that the second letter was written by Gemberling and Roberts. It's not signed by them. It was probably done by someone else. Why assume that Gemberling and Roberts had anything to do with the letters sent to the FBI by Helen Shirah and the other person who sighted Oswald in the doorway? They didn't work in the mail room, did they? 

The folks on Facebook seem to agree with me that the second letter is significant. It generated some Likes. 

Plus, that second letter establishes that the Altgens photo was only initially wired to the AP office in New York and then to other AP offices around the country. It wasn't wired to the world at large at 1:03. That is just a bull shit lie that bloodied people, like yourself, like to tell. 

So, it remains a Eureka find for me, and I assure you that that second letter does me a whole lot more good than it does you. I'm sure that if you had been the one to find it that you'd have destroyed it if you thought you could get away with it, you being the blood-soaked Kennedy-killer that you are. 

Ptoi, Backes! You're scum! You are no friend of John Kennedy, and you are certainly no friend of Lee Harvey Oswald. 

Billy Lovelady told the FBI that he wore a red and white vertical striped shirt and blue jeans. He told them that because that is what he wore. We even have a picture of him. If you look close, you can see the stripes. 

I put an R for red and a W for white and then R for red again so that you can see that stripes were there, just as he described. And he also demonstrated it. 

What's the alternative, Backes? To think that, by coincidence, there was another man there Lovelady's age and Lovelady's size in the spot Lovelady said he was, and at the time Lovelady said he was there, and that his clothing just happens to match the clothes that Lovelady said he wore and later posed in? Should we assume all that? Fuck you, Backes, you God-damn Kennedy-killer! You can't stop the march of JFK truth. You can't even slow it down.