Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Glenn B Fleming, who supports Oswald in the doorway, makes a good point about the Bush-like figure in the "Cops and Suits" photo: the ridge above the eyes is much more prominent on that figure than it is on Bush himself.

Glenn used the word "bridge" but I know he meant the ridge, the brow ridge or supraorbital ridge. The orbits are the sockets in your head for your eyes and the brow ridge is the prominent bone above them. 

One thing I have learned in doing this photographic work is that you have to stay mentally flexible. You have to stay open. It's because the men who killed Kennedy anticipated the need for photographic alteration, and they had ready the best team in the world to do it. 

So, when you get to a disconnection, like this brow ridge thing, you shouldn't be too quick to dismiss. Consider that maybe the disconnection was put there to throw us off. That's how subtle and sophisticated these criminal photo alterers were. As I said, I'm sure they were the best in the world at what they did.  

First, let's look at what Glenn is talking about. Here's the Bush-like figure alongside Poppy Bush. And I agree with Glenn that there's a disparity there. 

However, everything else matches: the tall lanky build, the high left shoulder from being left-handed, the hand in the pocket which was his habit, the suit and tie, the shape of the hairline (allowing for some age-related recession). In most respects, they are a darn-good match. But, the prominent brow of the Bush-like figure is a definite exception, a disparity.

So, what should we do? Call it off? Say it can't be him because of that one thing? That is exactly what the killers would like us to do. 

First, let's consider head proportions. Typically, the height of the head- from the top of the head to the bottom of the chin- is a little greater than the depth of the head- from the brow ridge to the back of the head. You can read about it here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Head

It includes this drawing of skull proportions by Leonardo DaVinci.

If you take a ruler to it, you'll see that the distance from the bottom of the chin to the top of the head is slightly greater than the distance from the brow ridge to the back of the head. The human head is slightly longer than it is deep. There is also this chart.

That's too small for you to study, but if you go to the site, you can study it. And it says the same thing: that the length of the head is slightly greater than the depth. But look at it on the Bush-like figure:

Is it just me, or is the depth of his head much greater than the length? Doesn't it seem like he's got a head like an accordion? Let's compare him to the others in the "Cops and Suits" photo:

  
Will you admit that compared to the others in the photo, who look normal, that the Bush-like figure has got a freakishly deep head? Let's look at it up-close:

Look at that massive head! Look at how deep it is! It is a freakish proportion. No human being on Earth could have dimensions like that. They enhanced that dimension. We'll compare him to Bush here, but we could compare him to anybody. Nobody is built like that.

It is just not normal. They messed with it. They stretched his head from front to back. Nobody could have such a freakish shape to their head.  

That guy was definitely Bush.

And remember that the only other name that has ever been proffered for that guy is Detective Gus Rose who had a round head like Charlie Brown. 

There is no way that guy was Rose. Every instinct in my being tells me that he was Bush. The super-wide head on the guy departs from Bush, but it also departs from everybody. 

Bottom line: When everything matches except for one thing, you don't question the everything; you question the one thing. Don't fall for the ruse. Don't react like the conspirators expected you to. 

They stretched his head, but that is Bush. I am sure of it.